Free Brief (Non Appeal) - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 297.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 27, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 450 Words, 2,709 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 842.4 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/33275/127-1.pdf

Download Brief (Non Appeal) - District Court of Arizona ( 297.5 kB)


Preview Brief (Non Appeal) - District Court of Arizona
I Robert Hardy Falk, Esq.
(TX {Ib7953fiI} , pro has vice}
2 ROBERT HARDY FALK, P.C.
Post Oflice Box 794748
3 Dallas, Texas 75379
Tel.: [214] 954-4ilU
4 Pax: (214) 9696941
E-mail: [email protected]
5
6 lvlichael G. Ackerman, Esq.
{CA 64997, pro Imc t>ict-ag
7 ACKER1*vIAN AND KEVO KIAN
2391 The Alameda, Suitc lftil
S Santa Clara, CA 9513513
Tel.? {4US) 261-5SI}I}
9 Fax: (4133) 261-59t1I1
E-mail: [email protected]
IU
Attorneys for Plaintiff, _
I I RONALD CRAIG FISH, a law corporation
12
13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
I5
RONALD CRAIG FISH, a law corporation, a Case No. CIV-D3-67-PHX-SMM
19 California corporation,
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
17 Plaintiff, JUDICIAL NOTICE
li} vs.
lil THOMAS G. WATKINS, III, an individual;
SKYLINE MANUFACTURING, INC., an
29 Arizona corporation, g
21 Defendants. I
22 _
2,; Plaintiff, Ronald Craig Fish, a lavv corporation, hereby requests that the Coun take -
2:4 Judicial Notice of the following;
25 {1] The docket cntrics in the case entitled Skyline ivlanufacturing, Inc. v. So-Lite,
26 Inc., et al., case number D1-C*v’-l}94t1;
H {2) Ronald Craig Pish’s memorandum of points and authorities tiled in support of
F ish’s motion for judgment ori the pleadings under FRCP I2[c) or, in alternative, to
2S
Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice
- I - Case No. CW-93-157-PHX-Slvllvl
I Case 2:O3—cv—OOO67—SI\/II\/I Document 127 Filed O4/27/2006 Paget 0f2

1 dismiss withcut Icsvc tc smcud fcr fsilurc tc ststc at clsim upcu which uslicf csh hc
2 gruntcd undcr FRCP l2[b][6],
3 {3) Defendant Rcnsld C. Fish, P.C.’s Rcply tc Jciut Mcticu By Defendants Sc—Litc
4 and Fish PE. fc Dismiss Undcr FRC]? 12[b][l] and l2[b}{6);
5 {4] Sky1inc’s Mcmcrsiidum in Oppcsiticn tc Fish’s Mcticui Fcr 2S U.S.C. §l92?
6 Sancticns; sud
T (5} Judge Murguisfs Mcmcraiidum Grdcr 1`Jstcd March 25, 2UtJ2.
E. (6) Thc Judgrncnt in Fsvcr cf Rctiald Fish, PC. cntcrcd March 25, 2U·D2.
9
[1] DATED: Ap1‘i1_,%2U{}ii ACKERM.·§,N HND KEVDRKIAN
1 1 F-) -‘.·
12 I J/s__I'L/v .· /· ' n._ _ ' __-
" ,- H EL" . 1 , .
13 { · %‘|i?t}ri1ir;:·;eIgs$ffcE::JPIain;iiT, Rcnuld Craig
, rpcra 1011
M {JemyussswisrusiisuusumSmippmius1M.k¤q1ud.si¤.wpd
15
16
12
18
15-,1
2l]
21
22
i 23
24
25
26
22
2S

- 2 — Cssc Nc. CIV-G3-62·PHX—SMM
Case 2:O3—cv—OOO67—SI\/II\/I Document 127 Filed O4/27/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 127

Filed 04/27/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 127

Filed 04/27/2006

Page 2 of 2