Free Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 72.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: July 24, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 447 Words, 2,842 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/33305/153.pdf

Download Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 72.7 kB)


Preview Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona
_ r
__ mso ___ LODGED
THIS .>@i.umENTHAS NOT mm __ RECEIVED ___ copv
e1.ecrnomcAu.v A§T2`é1c§511nSé1r§;me
1 James M_ McGee, E£gLl1lgg80F ARIZONNS ADMINISTRATIVE JUL 2 4 2007
2 Attorney at Law AND PROCEDURES IANUAI. Ic A P
state Bar No. 011931 CL11>T§r1l-§¤E$1 tl · $$1RT
3 P.O. Box 460 BY S cwcrv
Cottonwood, Arizona 86326 `
4 Telephone: 928.639.4747
5 FAX: 928.639.2190
5 Attorney for Defendants Home Mortgage, Inc., Carl Brown, Molly Brown
7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
9
CATHLEEN CHANNEL; THERESA NO.: CV2003-0100
10 WHARRY; STACIE HANSON; MONIQUE
NICHOLS;
11
12 PLAINTIFFS, _ MOTIONS IN LIMINE;
OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS’
13 vs. MOTION IN LIMINE
14 Home MoRTeAcE, mc., an Arizona
15 corporation conducting business in
Arizona; CARL BROWN; MOLLY BROWN;
16 GREG BROWN; JANE DOE BROWN; DOES
1-10; XYZ CORPORATIONS; BLACK
17 i=ARTNERsHiPs;
18 ¤EI=EN¤Aurs.
19 g
20 MOTIONS IN LIMINE.
21 Motion to exclude from evidence any mention of the Defendant’s relative wealth, or
22
lack thereof.
23
24 Motion to exclude from evidence specific commission agreements from which the
25 Plaintiffs claim, as the Plaintiffs have never submitted any such documentation.
26 Motion to exclude any testimony from the husband of one ofthe Plaintiffs (appearing
27 for the first time at the Settlement Conference in Flagstaff, still unidentified and not named in
28 the Complaint or Plaintiffs’ Witness List).
Case 2:O3—cv-OO100-ROS—IVIEA Document 153 Filed O7/24/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 Motion to exclude any testimony regarding the existence or use of any corporate
2 aircraft by HMI, as irrelevant.
3 Defendants’ OBJECTS to the PIaintiffs’ Second Motion in Limine regarding the
4 destruction of HMI’s corporate records by an unknown third gag. The records themselves
5 would establish either that (1) the Plaintiffs mn prove their claim, or that (2) they cannot.
6
Defendants are not required to prove PIaintiffs’ claims and should not be precluded from
7
8 introducing evidence that would tend to exculpate them from any liability.
9 .w""
1Q RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED thi of July, 2007
11
12 %
13 . % A
14 · MES MATHEW MCGEE
15 omey for Defendants
16 Ori inal mailed this
17MSy of July, 2007 to:
18 James burr Shields
Law Office of James Burr Shields ·
19 382 East Palm Lane
20 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-1531
21 Carl and Molly Brown
Home Mortgage Inc.
22 3845 N. 44 Street, Suite 100
23 Phoenix, Arizona 85018
24
25
l 26
27
Case 2:03-cv-00100-ROS—IVIEA Document 153 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-00100-ROS-MEA

Document 153

Filed 07/24/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-00100-ROS-MEA

Document 153

Filed 07/24/2007

Page 2 of 2