Free Supplement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 109.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: January 27, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 390 Words, 2,568 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 790.92 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/34011/194.pdf

Download Supplement - District Court of Arizona ( 109.7 kB)


Preview Supplement - District Court of Arizona
1 Marshall Meyers (020584)
2 KROHN & MOSS, LTD.
111 West Monroe, Suite 711 ·
3 Phoenix, AZ 85003
4 (602) 275-5588 3
(866) 385-5215 (facsimile)
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
. 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8 CHARLES DE SHAZER, ) Case No. CIV 03-869-PHX-FJM
9 1
10 Plaintiff, ) PLAINTIFI-l’S SUPPLEMENT
) PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
ll vs. )
12 > I
NATIONAL RV HOLDINGS, INC., ) ,
l3 and FREIGHTLINER CUSTOM ` ) `
14 CHASSIS CORPORATION )
)
15 Defendants.
16 T
1; RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this 27m day oflanuary, 2006..
is
19
By: _s/Marshall Meyers
20 Marshall Meyers 3
21 lan Pryor
KROHN & MOSS, LID.
22 111 West Monroe, 711
23 PIIOGIIIX, AZ
Attorney for Plaintiff
24 1
25 Filed electronically on this 27th day oflanuary, 2006, with:
26 United States District Court CM/ECF system
27 Copy mailed on this 27th day oflanuary, 2006, to:
28 - -
Hon. Frederick I. Martone
-
Case 2:03-cv—OO869-FJIVI Document 194 Filed O1/27/2006 Page 1 of 3

I United States District Court, District of`Ari2ona A
2 401 West Washington
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Q
3 I
4 Notification sent electronically via the Cou1t’s ECP system and mailed on this 27th day of
January, 2006 to:
5
6 William M. Shattuck
Quarles & Brady Streich Lang LLP
7 Renaissance One
8 Two North Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85004
9
10 Mr. John C. Hendricks E
Meagher & Geer PLLP
ll 8800 N. Gainey Center Dr. Suite 261
12 Scottsdale, AZ 85250
I3 s/Cathy Bog}; ` ‘
14 Cathy Bopp
15
I6 i
17
18
19
20
21 #
24
25
26
27
28 Q
Case 2:03-cv—OO869-FJIVI Document 194 Filed O1/27/2006 Page 2 of 3

I Plaintiff"s Proposed Jury Instruction No. 33 A
; The law which applies to this case authorizes an award of nominal damages. I I I
4 you find for the plaintiff but you find that the plaintiff has failed to prove damages a E
5 defined in these instructions, you must award nominal damages- Nominal damages may
6 not exceed one dollar.
9 _____Accepted
10 _Rejected 5
M _l\/[odified
l2
14 Ninth Circuit Model 7..6 ;
15
16
17
rs
19
20 .
21
22
24 l
26
28
Case ‘2:O3—cv—OO869-FJIVI Document 194 Filed O1/27/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-00869-FJM

Document 194

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-00869-FJM

Document 194

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-00869-FJM

Document 194

Filed 01/27/2006

Page 3 of 3