1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Value Options, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE Document 127 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Shannon Michael Clark, Plaintiff, vs.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CIV 03-1344-PHX-EHC ORDER
On August 2, 2005, the Court denied both parties' Motions for Summary Judgment with leave to file subsequent motions. [See Dkt. 121]. On August 3, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Supplement Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's [sic] Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. 122]. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot, without prejudice to filing an amended summary judgment motion. [Dkt. 122]. DATED this 11th day of August, 2005.