I
1
2
4
7
6
7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
s FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Shannon Michael Clark, CV 03-1344-PHX-Ei-IC (MS)
10 Plaintiff,
11
l _ 12 vs. l ORDER
Value Options, et al.,
13 Defendants.
14
15 Before the Court is Plaintiffs "Motion for Docket Sheet" filed July 22, 2005. ln his
16 motion, Plaintiff states that he has recently moved to another facility and that some of
-17 his legal papers were lost in the move. Therefore, Plaintiff requests a docket sheet "to
18 determine which documents are missing."
19 The Court will deny Plaintiffs motion. As the Court stated in its June 20, 2005
2 0 Order addressing t·he same request, dispositive motions, which have been fully briefed,
2 1 are currently pending disposition. Further, Plaintiff does not submit copies of any formal
22 grievance Hled with ADOC seeking return of legal documents. Therefore, the Court
23 finds that no cause exists at this time for the provision of the Court's docket sheet to
24 Plaintiff at the Court's expense. Plaintiff may request copies from the Clerk on payment
25 of the CIerk's fees in advance. Accordingly,
26 /// _ l
27 ///
28 ///
Case 2:03—cv—01344-EHC-HCE Document 120 Filed 07/26/2005 Page 1 of 2 l
1 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs "Motion Requesting Docket Sheet" tiled July 22,
2 2005 is DENIED without prejudice.
2 DATED this 2 §+LcEay of July, 2005.
4
5 J
7 .
8 MORTON SITVER
9 United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12 ` `
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 l 4
20
21
22
23
24 i
l 25 _
26 4
27 _
28
2
Case 2:O3—cv—O1344-EHC-HCE Document 120 Filed O7/26/2005 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE
Document 120
Filed 07/26/2005
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE
Document 120
Filed 07/26/2005
Page 2 of 2