Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
, SHANNON MICHAEL CLARK, No. 06-17005 .
T D.C. No. CV-03-01344-
Plaintiff- Appellant, EHC/I·ICE
V.
VALUE OPTIONS, INC.; etal., JUDGMENT ~
Defendants - Appellees. · - - -- A -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix). l .
On consideration whereof] it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.
Filed and entered 12/04/06 ég]§_,Q(EACg§1§ERSON
. Clerk or --~~-- iQ
ATTEST I -_·
0 te¤twrozs
¤=*=
Case 2:03-cv—01344-EHC-HCE Document 293 Filed O1/16/2007 Page 1 of 2 ·

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
DEC 4 2006
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT cATwé cp&21;rg|§Ar:.IpPr~éAc-r§ERK
SHANNON MICHAEL CLARK, No. 06-17005
Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV-03-01344-EHC
‘ ` District of Arizona,
v. - Phoenix
VALUE OPTIONS, INC.; etal., l _ I i' ‘ " e
ORDER
Defendants — Appellees. .
Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over
this appeal because the order challenged in the order challenged in the _appeal is
not final or appealable. Sec Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chaccn v. Babcock, 640 F.2d
221 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it,_disposes of all claims as to all
parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal
is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. ` I
A mus <:0r>v
cAtr-rv A. <:ArrEr2s0r~r
Clerk of Court
Arrest
c IANA as 2002 I
A I A A;
rsose · ¤y=.7[;?,.L.,é. ~
Case 2:03—cv—01344-EHC-HCE Document 293 Filed O1/16/2007 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE

Document 293

Filed 01/16/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01344-EHC-HCE

Document 293

Filed 01/16/2007

Page 2 of 2