1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 The City of Phoenix, et al., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pending is Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Deadline For Filing of Notice of Appeal (Doc. 17 144). The Court will not address the merits of the Motion for Reconsideration until the time 18 for filing a notice of appeal has passed. 19 Accordingly, 20 IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Stay Deadline (Doc. 144) is GRANTED. The time 21 for Plaintiff Mark August to file a Notice of Appeal is extended thirty days. The Notice of 22 Appeal is due December 13, 2006. 23 DATED this 13 day of November, 2006. 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS Document 145 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Teresa August, et al., Plaintiff, vs.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV 03-1892-PHX-ROS ORDER