Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

EXHIBIT C

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 1 of 12

I 2 3 4

Kathleen L. Wieneke, Bar #011139 Jennifer L. Holsman, Bar #022787 JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULJ, P.L.C. 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Telephoue: (602) 263-1700 Fax: (602) 200-7858

[email protected]
[email protected] Attorneys for Defeudants City of Phoenix, Griffin, Dunn, Lynde and Monson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
6 7 8 9 10

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

I Teresa August, et ai,
Plaintiff, v. The City of Phoeuix, et aI, Defendant.
II

I NO. CV03-1892-PHX-ROS
I

II II

JOINT PROPOSED FORMS

VERDICT

12
13 14

15
16 17

I I and

Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants City of Phoenix, Griffin, Lynde, Dunn Monson, submit the following Proposed Verdict Forms for consideration by the Court

18 II as follows: Plaintiff's Proposed Verdict Forms are attached as Exhibit I; Defeudants 19 II Proposed Verdict Forms are attached as Exhibit 2. 20 II 21 22 The parties reserve the right to amend the Proposed Verdict Forms to couform to the evidence at trial. Plaintiff objects to Defendants' Verdict Forms regarding Plaintiffs state law

23 II claims and comparative fault. Plaiutiff further requcsts that on each Verdict Form the 24 II Defendants be listed vertically, with a line next to their names. 25

i

Defendants assert that the state law Verdict Form is appropriate as the claim

26 I remain at issue.
1713081.1

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 2 of 12

I 2 3 4

DATED this

] 7th day of November, 2006. JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULI, P.L.C.

By

5
6 7 8

s/Jennifer L. Holsman Kathleen L. Wieneke Jennifer L. Holsman 290 I North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Defendants City of Phoenix, Griffin, Dunn, Lynde and Monson

TREON & SHOOK 9

10
II

By

12 13
14 ElectronicaDy filed and served this 17th day of November, 2006, to: ALL PARTIES ON ELECTRONIC COPY e-mailed this same date to:

s/Daniel B. Treonlper authorization Daniel B. Treon 2700 North Central Avenue, Suite] 000 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Attorneys for Plaintiff

15
16

SERVICE LIST

17
18 19

20 2] 22
23

The Hon Rosalyn O. Silver United States District Court Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, Suite 624 40] West Washington Street, SPC 59 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 s/Glor!a Grav

24
25

26
1713081.1

2

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 3 of 12

EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 4 of 12

1 2 3

4 5
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

7 8
9

10 II Theresa August, a single woman,
11

CV 03 ~ 1892 PHX ROS Plaintiff, VERDICT

12 13

v. City of Phoenix police officers Dunn, Monson, Griffin and Lynde, Defendants.

14
15

16
17

We the jury, duly empanelled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon our oaths, do find in favor of Plaintiff on Plaintiffs excessive force claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We further find in favor of Plaintiff on Plaintiffs excessive force claim under 42 V.S.C. §1983 as against the following defendants. Defendant Dunn Defendant Monson Defendant Griffm Defendant Lyle

18 19

20
21

22
23

24
25 26
1713078.1

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 5 of 12

1 2 3 411 BY
Foreperson

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
II
]713078.1

2

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 6 of 12

EXHIBIT 2

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 7 of 12

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Theresa August, a single woman, 9 Plaintiff, 10 II VERDICT CV 03-1892 PHX ROS UNITED STATES DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT

OF ARIZONA

v.

The City of Phoenix, a body politic of the State 12 II of Arizona; et. a!., 13 14 15

I

I

Defendants.

We the jury, duly empanelled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon do find in favor of the Defendants on Plaintiff's state law claim of excessive

16

I our oaths,

17 ~ force. 18 19

20
21 BY--------------

22
23 24

Foreperson

25
26
1713071.1

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 8 of 12

1 2 3 4

5
6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CV 03 - 1892 PBX ROS Plaintiff, VERDICT v.

9 II Theresa August, a single woman, 10 11

!

12 II The City of Phoenix, a body politic of the State of Arizona; et. aI., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 We the jury, duly empanelled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon our oaths, do find in favor of the Defendants on Plaintiffs excessive force claim under 42 V.S.C. § 1983.

20
21

22
23
BY ~

to.oreperson

,

24 25 26
1713077,]

2

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 9 of 12

I 2
3

4
5

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8

9
10 I] 12 13

I Theresa

August, a single woman, Plaintiff,

CV 03 - 1892 PHX ROS

VERDICT

v.
City of Phoenix police officers Dunn, Monson,
Griffin and Lynde, Defendants.

14
15

16 17
18 19

We the jury, duly empanelled

and sworn in the above-entitled excessive

action, upon

our oaths, do find in favor of Plaintiff on Plaintiffs § 1983 and find the full damages to be $ Defendant Defendant Defendant Defendant Griffm Lynde Dunn Monson

force claim under 42 V.S.C.

as against the following Defendants:

20
21

22
23

2411
25 26

By
Foreperson

_

1713077.1

3

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 10 of 12

1 2
3

4

5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT DISTRICT

COURT

8 9 10 II
12

OF ARIZONA

Theresa August, a single woman, Plaintiff,

CV 03 - 1892 PBX ROS VERDICT

v. 13 The City of Phoenix, a body politic of the State 14 II of Arizona; et. a!., IS II 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1713077.1

Defendants.

We the jnry, duly empanelled and sworn in the above-entitled action, upon our oaths, do find in favor of Plaintiff Theresa August on her state law claim of excessive force and fmd the full damages to be $ _

We find the relative degrees of fault to be: (If a party is not at fault, put a zero (0) on the percentage line for that party). Plaintiff Defendant Griffm Defendant Lynde Defendant Dunn Defendant Monson
4

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 170-6

Filed 11/17/2006

Page 11 of 12

111 2 3 4 5 IIBY 6 " 7
8

TOTAL

100%

Foreperson

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

I

1713077.1

5
Document 170-6 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 12 of 12

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS