Free Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 37.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 452 Words, 2,778 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/34948/205.pdf

Download Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Arizona ( 37.6 kB)


Preview Stipulation of Dismissal - District Court of Arizona
1 Kathleen L., Wieneke, Bar #011 139-
Jennifer L. Holsman, B-ar #022787
2 JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULI, P-.I...C.
2901 North Central Avenue., Suite 800
3 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 _
Telephone: (602) 263-1700
4 F ax: (60-2) 200-78-58
lqwienekegljshiirm.-com
5 jholsman .s·hfirm.co-m
.6 Attomeys for Defendant The City of Phoenix,
et al
7
8 UNITE-D STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
I-0 Teresa August, et al, NO. CV03—l 892-PHX-ROS
I 1 Plaintiff, `STIPULATION TO DISMISS-CITY
OF PHOENIX ANI) PLAINTIFF‘S
I2 v. STATE LAW CLAIMS
I3 The City of Phoenix, et al.,
I4 Defendant.
15
1.6 COME NOW THE PARTIES, by and though counsel undersigned, and
17 pursuant to Rule 41 , FED. R. CIV. P., hereby Stipulate-as to the following:
18 (I) The City .of Phoenix be dismissed with prejudice as a Defendant; and,
19 (2) Plaintiffs State Law Claims against all Defendants be dismissed with
20 prejudice.
-21 (3) The parties understand that dismissal of The City of Ph‘niX and the
22 State law claims do not have any impact on Pl-aintiffs claim under -42 U.S.C. § 1983
23 against the individual officers. Defendant City of Phoenix -and Defendant officers ‘3gTC`G
24 -that dismissal of the City do.es netamount to a- release, waiver, accord and satisfaction, or
25 limitation of Plai-ntiff’ s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim.
2.6
1-mz.U4.|
Case 2:03-cv—01892-ROS Document 205 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 (4) The parties further stipulate that each will bear its costs and fees
2 incurred in respect to the claims against the City and the state law claims, and that
3 dismissal of these claims does not impair Plaintitt’-s claim for attomeys’ fees under
4 Section l-988, in the event she has ·one.
5 DATED this /516day of December, 2006.
6 JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULI, P.L.C.
7
Kathleené. Wieneke
9 Jennifer L. Holsman
. 2901 N-orth Central Avenue, Suite .8.00
10 Phpaaix, Arizona 85012 ,
Attorneys- for Defendant The City of
I I Phoenix,. et al ‘
I2 TREON at sir oaf
13-
. By- }
14 Daniel B. Treon ,
2700 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000
I5 Phoenix, Arizona 8.5004
I6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
17
lg Electronically tiled and served this
/5712 day of December, 2006, to:
19
20 ALL PARTIES ON ELECTRONIC SERVICE LIST
2] COPY e-mailed this same date to:
22 The Hon Rosalyn O. Silver
23 United States District Court
Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, Suite 624
24 401 West Washington Street, SPC 59
25 Phoe o11‘a 85003 _
ni-uim.1 2
Case 2:03-cv—01892—ROS Document 205 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 205

Filed 12/15/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01892-ROS

Document 205

Filed 12/15/2006

Page 2 of 2