Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ALVIN LARUE PINKOSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, ) CAPTAIN TATE, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________)

9 10 11 12 13 14

CIV 03-01928 PHX MHM (MEA) SCHEDULING ORDER

This is a civil rights action filed by a individual
15

who is incarcerated and who is without counsel.
16 17

Therefore,

this case is exempted from the requirements of Rule 26(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires the parties
18

to file a Rule 26(f) statement prior to the issuance of a
19

scheduling
20 21

order.

See

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

26(f)

(2005).

Additionally, no initial disclosure is required in actions brought without counsel by a person in the custody of a state
22

or a state subdivision.
23

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(E))

(2005).
24 25

Therefore, the Court will not require the parties to

submit an initial disclosure statement. The parties are put on notice that the following
26

schedule shall not be modified except upon a showing of good
27

cause and by leave of court.
28

Case 2:03-cv-01928-ROS-MEA

Document 17

Filed 11/10/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS ORDERED that: 1. All requests for discovery shall be served by April 21, 2006. 2. All motions regarding discovery shall be filed by May 26, 2006. 3. All motions to join parties or to further amend pleadings shall be filed by May 26, 2006. 4. All dispositive motions shall be filed by June 30, 2006. 5. All other pretrial motions, other than motions in limine, shall be filed by July 28, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may take

Plaintiff's deposition, if he chooses, no later than February 10, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall lodge a joint pretrial statement and proposed order, on or before July 28, 2006, or in the event one or more dispositive motions is filed, within 90 days of the does court's not ruling on the the last case.

dispositive

motion

that

dispose

of

Defendants are responsible for initiating the drafting and submission of the proposed pretrial order in the form

prescribed by the assigned trial judge. DATED this 9th day of November, 2005.

-2Case 2:03-cv-01928-ROS-MEA Document 17 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 2 of 2