Free Motion for Hearing or Conference - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 56.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 5, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 387 Words, 2,572 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35200/115.pdf

Download Motion for Hearing or Conference - District Court of Arizona ( 56.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Hearing or Conference - District Court of Arizona
` * 1 T\\1~.____
\ HLED “"t+—·
i.1l_?h4;tey¤1 ""ifxgggg
/ ~.¤ a*;....L_,
Timothy Lee Ward, 148256 FEB 0 4 ZGG8 3
l Arizona State Prison Complex- Florence U 1
South Unit C?1§°f+<' U éiziiif ¤*i<"e:;‘ regu
2 Post Office Box 8400 Hy mh”?N@T1J§,;Qgj&A ·‘·.! HT
Florence, Arizona 85232-8400 `*¥¥Z;:;;;;;:ij€ DQMUTY
3 Plaintiff Pro-Per `Mm
4
5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
) Case No.: CIV—O3-2159-PHX-ROS (JRI)
8 Timothy Lee Ward, )
)
9 Plaintiff, )
) Motion for Informal Telephonic
10 VS· ) Conference
)
11 Sgt. Carr, et. al., )
)
12 Defendant )
13 Comes now, the Plaintiff, Timothy Lee Ward, pro-per, pursuant to Rule 37
14 (A) and Local Rule 7.2 (J), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
15 hereby requests this Honorable Court for an informal telephonic conference.
16 On January 22, 2008, the Defendants sent the Plaintiff their Response to
17 his Request for Production of Documents and Responses to Plaintiff's
18 Interrogatories to both Defendants. There are numerous objections as well as
19 a few interrogatories that were not answered. On <5;A!\> 99, 3008 , the
20 Plaintiff sent a letter to the Attorneys for the Defendants requesting a
21 telephonic conference to discuss the issues. As of the date of this Motion
22 the Plaintiff has not received any type of communication from the Defendants
23 Attorneys.
24
25
Case 2:03-cv—O2159-ROS-JRI Document 115 Filed O2/O4/2008 Page 1 of 2

1 Wherefore, the Plaintiff, request an informal telephonic conference with 1
2 the Magistrate Judge as well as the Attorneys for the Defendants so that a
3 solution or an agreement can be reached before filing a motion to compel.
4 - - 97/
Respectfully submitted this I day of February, 2008
5 z=5§!e—
6
Timothy Lee Ward
7 Plaintiff Pro-Per
8
9 - - - - $7/
Copies of the foregoing mailed this I day of February, 2008, to:
10 Office of the Clerk
United Stated District Court
ll 401 West Washington Street, SPC-1
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2118
12
Ms. Michele L. Forney, Attorney
13 Arizona Attorney General’s Office
1275 West Washington
14 Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2997
Attorneys for Defendants 1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 2:03-cv—O2159-ROS-JRI D0cume111 115 Filed O2/O4/2008 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02159-ROS-JRI

Document 115

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02159-ROS-JRI

Document 115

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 2 of 2