Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

ii 1. l. 1 .
'*`“ 4`?·i'.`I1; _ N _ U U U .._ .
3 I
. 4 } , y , l ; P
i s E i
6 ` IINI THE UNI-TED STATES DISTRICT COURT ‘- _ .
7 I ” FOR THE D|STRlC‘T OF ARIZONA l _
SE. I . , ,
A 9, - Doyle Burns, , I , No. CV 03-2273-PHX-JWS (MS) , A
101 ‘ Plaintiff, -7 _ `E ‘ _ E
ll I vs. I 7 A s onoen 1 I
, 13, Charles Ryan, etal., 1 y . j
_ ` -1-4 _ Defendant. _ ‘ . _ ·
151 r
- · 16.% . Before- the Court is Plaintiffs "Stipula-tion to Amend Complaint"-filed Junet.23, _
17 2005 and Defendants "Motion to Strike Piaiintiffs Stipulationto Amend .CompIaint't
18 Hled July 6, 2005. _ in his stipulation, Plaintiffs states that he agrees-that he should
19 be allowed to amendihis complaint to add-references to a notice of claim, corrected y
20 dates, and medications and services provided or not-provided to him. The document
y 21 does. not indicate that Defendants stipulate to allowing Plaintiff to amend the -
-22, complaint. Indeed; Defendants seek strike the document because it was _
- 241 ` _ Defendants tiled--a itllotion for summary Judgment on June 14.,,2005 .(Doc._#_
, y 1 25 70). The Court previdedthat Plaintiff respond to that motion by July18,‘2005-toethat ,
. 261 motion (Doo. # 74)., lf-Plaintlff's "Stipulation*' tiled June 23, 2005-*is an attempt to `·
. 27 respond to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs response is not
A se 2:03-cv—02273-JWS—IVIS.l ·Document 78 Filed 07/15/2005 Page1of2 _ I I. _

_ y W ·- _1. in proper-form. Plaintiff was instructed by the Counts Order as to how he should
respond to the Mozaenilror Summary Judgment. . l · _ l A l l A
3 X i lf Plaintiff seeks toiarnend the complaint-at this juncture, .a.-”Stipulation to
j 4i amend" is notthe properwayto seek ‘suoh·amendment·unless Defendants give their
5 consent. lnsteadA_.__-Plaintiff must tile a motion-to_amen,d on the-- proper court form and
6 lodge a proposed amended complaint. Theproposed amended complaint may not A
_ - 7 incorporate any previously- filed complaint. Plaintiff is advised that an untimely j l sl
- - -8‘ attempt to amend the complaint, without. suflicient justification, may be- denied. A- l
‘_ _ ·` _ 9i __ Purther, the Court reminds-P`l·aintiff_that- certain issues related to the tiling of a' notice
i 10 of claim that haveAalready been resolved by the-Court (age Doc. #52) cannot be re- j
` 11 I raised in an amended complaint. Accordingly,. .
2 12 IT IS ORDERED that "Stipulatiorl to- Amend Complaint" tiled June 23,
r 13 2005, which the Court construed, in part;,.as a motion to amend the complaint, is
A .14 . denied without prejudice t;e;easons_stated herein.- ._ l ·
_ i _15 DATED this , j j __.` day gf JujyI29()5_` j j .· j j a
1 t 17 i 2 " , A A
l is, . _/ A A 2 ,
19 . ¢ < i l
21 g l , agistrate Judge _- . __
25 1 jj j j
_ 27 i ‘ '..A. U U. _ . l i U ‘ U
. , . C se 2:O3—cv-O227I3—JW$—I\/IS Document 78 Filed O7/15/2005 Page 2 of 2 ‘ . ·

Case 2:03-cv-02273-JWS-MS

Document 78

Filed 07/15/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02273-JWS-MS

Document 78

Filed 07/15/2005

Page 2 of 2