Free Answer to Writ of Garnishment - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

oor—aa—z0or 12:57 me LEeaL Hrrn P .. eoz
' I
I
2 I I
i
3 I
A I
s
6 I Y
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 5
S I DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
I
9 ' »
IIAWRENCE J., WARFIELD, as Receiver, ` Case N0..: CV O3-2390-PHX-.JAT I
*0 I _ _ ftmended I
H { Judgment Creditor, ANSWER OF GARNISHEE
12 I vs.. (Earnings)
I3 1}/IICI-IAEL ALANIZ; ROBERT CARROLL; et
14 ?1“’
I 5 I Judgment Debtors,
I
I6 1iNG USA ANNUITY LIFE AND -
17 JINSURANCE CO.,
18 ,I_.._L_rLL_@m-...._.L._.-._
19 I I I am the above-named garnish:-ze or am authorized by the garnishee to make
1
20 this afi} davit on its behalf; regarding the writ of gamishment served OH the gamishee on this
I ..
21 are _5e;>}t:atezrii_.e».,&;a;___.-,LI .._.. I
22 2), Was the judgment debtor employed?-Ig>y_tlge Gaza}; datejlbe rxas
23 sierved? (Circle Answer) Ycg (N0 OL) tl:/°I*I*0f2_2$·€ TU 0OCb l
24 3. Does the garnishee anticipate owing earnings to the _ judgment debtor within §
25 sixty (60) days after the date ef service ofthe writ? @ No - I
- 4.. Ifthe garnisiiee is unable to determine the identity ef the judgment debtor after
xnaking a good faith effort to do se, die following is a statement of the garnishee's·et`t`ort made
I I
and the reasons for the inability: 0 Ice I
il _ I
I I i
Case 2:O3—cv-O2390—JAT Document 792 Filed 10/O9/2007 Page 1 of 3 I

OCT—O9—2007 12: sr me LEGAL urrn P . ooa
‘ s
z
` I
2 a I
I 3 I t
I 5 State the dare ofthe judgment debtors next two (2) paydays occurring after the _
4 z
5 date of service of the writ: 521.. Q I I0 IO`? Sb- Q I (‘];IO'7 E
I .
6 I 6.. ls the judgment debtor employed by the garnrshee currently? Yes No Q
7 I if yes, judgment debtor is paid (Circle which apply): I FQSPEDSQ l
==l=I=§·I—, i\0w€.x£.f;
‘1 S ' thl . _ . 3
S I Dm Y €ITl·lTHOD Y
9 I Weekly Monthly u.’*€,€.
IO i Biweekly Other (Specify)
ll I 7. What is the amount of`the outstanding _j1.1dgment now due and owing as stated ‘
12 in are writ'?
13 I Judgment Balance TOTAL AMOUNT§DUE as of August 29, 2007 for which no f
payment has been made is $73,061.60.
M I 8.. Is the judgment debtor subject to anlexisting wage assignment, garnishrnent or
15 ]_%vy? Yes ® Ifyes, give the n;-irne, address and telephone number 0f`thatjudg111e¤i
I6
dreditor:
17 I
T8 I ..—
19 I 9. Did garnishee answer "Yes" to either question No.2 or No.3? No
20 I lf yes, copies of this answer and copies ofthe notice to judgment debtor, red-iiest for
21 lIrearing and noncxempt earnings statement were delivered to thejudgment debtor on (insert
22 tI1e date): {)‘)€§§§f( ' Ing I£ QMZ to the following address (if applicable):
23 I U
24 (Mark which method) By to the Judgment Debtor-; or f
25 _ Regular first-class mail to the address determined to be best calculated to
`
rech the jud gment debtor in a timely manner; or
I Service pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to a summons.
z ‘
I i
I
E
I 2
I Case 2:O3—cv-O2390—JAT Document 792 Filed 10/O9/2007 Page 2 of 3

ocr—oe-zoor iz 1 sr me LEGAL arm r>.oo».r
`C ' T
1
E 10. Copies ofthis answer and nonexernpt eamings statement were delivered on
2 5 " __, ’
I Q Qcggthe judgment crediior, or irs attorney, if applicable, at the
3 l
following address: .
4 . · , _ . gT¤me,1; no <¤=>·r(>l\=g
l lcmel ZC\*CgE_\_`}L‘2;iCZ‘P 22`Ou§Q;S£ *711; / @,.0·¥&1l\re mwplxlhn er.5712 Q-
s g 3S`SO(Y>’di\ *“ *1 by nggl- Oo. em *Q°€· §
6 phO€"dl`K; iq 2 P/EU 3 Q‘@n{>¢2 Az QSCE1 *5787 5
P5
2 I (Mark which method) _2X2___ By to Judgment Debtor; or ‘
S { ____ Regular i`1rst—class mail to the address determined to be best calculated to
9 ieach the Judgment Debtor in a timely manner; or
in ; ________ Service pursuant to the Rules of'Civi1 Procedure applicable to a summons.
l1 11.. Garnishee%;é122a;An2e22aiidE2r=2s2s and telephone nurggigis: 2 22_Q22Ih$ 2 @2
12 E l5`l -F&t'mLf\5rd\ P¤J€· _,`l$»`·?=l _7223222
‘ ar+Q>e1 “ cr gxwsca ·
13 E 12.. I hhire read the forhgoing document and know of my own knowledge that the
I4 %3C'[S 5‘E3,I€d 1hBI€lI'l 31‘€ UUE and correct.
15 i WPIEREFORE, gamishec prays that the garnishee be discharged on this 3,I'lSWC]` and
36 rihat the court award gamishee reasonable compensation in the amount of O
17 1 C5c>~¤<=;c·:\<<;ul· /04-07
8 STATE OF-r;kli@·r·J¤¤l—· ) ;
‘ l .11¤<1~¤>r<5 alas
22 County of M·a1·reope· ) _..l *
d ' - - i` M __ ` L
gg l Si re of Garnishee ¥
i or Authorized Agent 2
21 2
22 susscmeeo AND swomsr this date: py m§;;5.;; 1?.=·, ~>c>C>fZ_
' * 1
23 1 Hgiéég gn 5..11s.M _
l —" N ly Public
24 My Commission Expires: Q
25 My Commission Exp. April so, 2011 ;
f —*"‘“";
l Q
l
i " l 3 i
1
= Case 2:O3icv-O2390—JAT Document 792 Filed 10/O9/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT

Document 792

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT

Document 792

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT

Document 792

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 3 of 3