Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES A. MILLS, No. 05-16739
D.C. No. CV-03-02444-ROS
Plaintiff- Appellant,
v.
JUDGMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix). _
This cause came on to be heard on the Transcript of the Record from the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Phoenix) and was duly
submitted.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the judgment of the said District Cotut in this cause be, and hereby is
AFFIRMED.
Filed and entered Friday, June 9, 2006
Arrzue —~.
e 3f$lQ`£¥Pe‘é’*t*F"`*“‘$‘?»“ i
Aren ” -- 0 js
l ~ e Tn - *" E ·
A L_1;20lI6 ;
by .
. 7 ·_·
Case 2:03—cv—02444—ROS Document 51 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 3

. . =~f?-
. NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 09 2006
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS cxrug %g:d;1;rgI5§pPnéAcr§ERx
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES A. MILLS, No. 05-16739
Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV—03-02444-ROS
v.
MEMoRANDUM*
CITY OF PHOENIX; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
submitted June 5, 2006 **
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
A review of the record and the response to the court’s April 14, 2006 order
to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial
1
I This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be
cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
T This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case 2:03—cv—02444—ROS Document 51 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 2 of 3

2
05-16739
as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858
(9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). _
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district cou1t’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
2
Case 2:03—cv—02444—ROS Document 51 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02444-ROS

Document 51

Filed 10/17/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02444-ROS

Document 51

Filed 10/17/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02444-ROS

Document 51

Filed 10/17/2006

Page 3 of 3