Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

M { UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D
0CT 1 7 2005
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WHY A GATTERSON CLERK
us. count or trims
JAMES A. MILLS, N0. 05-16739
Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV-03-02444-ROS
District of Arizona,
v. Phoenix
CITY OF PHOENIX; etal., I `
ORDER
Defendants - Appellees. _ ‘ -
The court’s records indicate that this appeal was tiled during the pendency
of a timely-tiled Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) motion. The notice of appeal is therefore
ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding.
See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court shall be held
in abeyance pending the district court’s resolution of the pending August 8, 2005
motion. See Leader Nat? Ins. C0. v. Industrial Indemnity Ins. C0., 19 F.§d 444
(9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days of the district court’s ruling on the pending August
8, 2005 motion, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and
whether he intends to prosecute this appeal. Appellant shall further note whether
he wishes to amend the notice of appeal to include the district court’s ruling on the
post-judgment motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). i
smpnosaxeientenisxzoosii0.0505-16739.wpd
Case 2:03—cv—02444—FlOS Document 48 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 2

05-16739 l
A copy of this ordcr shall bc scrvcd O1'1 thc district court. See Fed. R. App.
P. 3(d)
For thc Court:
CATHY A. CATTERSON
A -- Clerk o hc Court - ·r ·
Jo h illiams
puty Clcrk
Local Rule 27-7
l
S:\PROSE\c1cr1 Case 2:03—cv—02444—ROS Document 48 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02444-ROS

Document 48

Filed 10/28/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02444-ROS

Document 48

Filed 10/28/2005

Page 2 of 2