Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

p UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT EARL KRONCKE, No. 05-16038
. D.C. No. CV-03-02481-MHM
` Plaintiff- Appellant, . ·
JUDGMENT
STATE OF ARIZONA, sued in individual ‘ -
_ & official capacity; et al., ‘ `
l Defendants - Appellees, p `
And y
TERRY L STEWART; et al., _
l Defendants - Appellees. U
l I i Appeal from the United States District Court forthe District of Arizona l
(Phoenix). C
l This cause came on to be heard on the Transcript of the Record from the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Phoenix) and was duly
_ submitted. i A - _ ( . l
. On consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
_ Court, that the judgment ofthe said District Court in this cause be, and hereby is
summarily AFFIRMED. . . A
Filed and entered 02/24/06 _ · A£§rQg§§AQ{<§1`!rERSON‘ E
. I · ‘
I I ‘ ;<1— 5, i _ Ig; · ..
IJ/"'?."?’%’F’@»
2 A é§;;<’R`¤·I>·g·¤’I$ IMM
I ` ,_,/, '-__ _ : 13 - ,:
I Case 2:O3—cv—O2481-I\AHI\/I--I\AEA Document 27 Filed O5/O3/2006 Page 1 of 3

l NOT FOR PUBLICATION
_ FEB 24 2006
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS_ cArHxén&gug¥1;r§'g§|g_néAen§EnK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT p
ROBERT EARL KRONCKE, A No. 05-16038 s
Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV-03-02481-MHM
v.
A MEMoRANt>UM*
STATE OF ARIZONA, sued in individual
& official capacity; etal.,
Defendants - Appellees,
and p l
TERRY L STEWART; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees. -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona `
Mary H. Murguia, Distict Judge, Presiding _ t
submitted Febmaiy 21, 2006**
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be `
cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36·~3.
`"°` This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). _
Case 2:O3—cv—O2481-I\AHI\A—-MEA Document 27 Filed O5/O3/2006 Page 2 of 3

F , • A I g .· ·
1
.§‘ a - _
05-16038
Appellant’s motion to correct the caption is granted. Accordingly, the Clerk
shall amend the docket to reflect the above-corrected caption. ‘
A review of the record, the opening brief, and appellant’s response to the
November 23, 2005 order to show cause indicates that the questionsraised in this A
appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v.
Heaton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. l982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. g
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRNIED W
i A TR
- CATHL¢EA A Clerk of Court
*”.§$I-~rr·» . .. .
r aj ,§;€*‘APi€
Q Y, Buije.¤E'“[`};“ ,
· Ze .¢-• a ri: ' ;‘·—
f/Jl /`/:_J—` --2 _ \-./ *-3..*Qu l
. V `_?——4~·"Q e'? -
l 2
Case 2:O3—cv—O2481-I\AHI\{I—-I\AEA Document 27 Filed O5/O3/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02481-MHM--MEA

Document 27

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02481-MHM--MEA

Document 27

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02481-MHM--MEA

Document 27

Filed 05/03/2006

Page 3 of 3