Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 65.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 21, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 561 Words, 3,448 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35548/188.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona ( 65.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona
1 William R. Hobson, SBN 006887
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM R. HOBSON
2 7303 W. Boston Street
. Chandler, AZ 85226
3 Telephone No. (480) 705-7550
Facsimile No. (480) 705-7503
4 Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 . FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 II ONALD CHAPMAN
Case No: CV 03 2537 PHX DGC
10
11
Plaintiff,
12
13 o1-IN E. Porrnn, POSTMASTER lg,-;{}§gg,{E§%§§g%NHEg
GENERAL, UNITED STATES ,
14 , OSTAL SERVICE; NATIONAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS
r- osTAL MAIL HANDLER’S UNION, MOTION EOR SUMMARY
15 oNNE r·1tARsoN SEPARATELY JUDGMENT AND EOR HIS REPLY
_ ND IN HER INDIVfDUAL TO DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
15 APACITY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
17 Defendants.
18
19 E
20
21
22
Plaintiff Donald Chapman ("Chapman") moves for this court to enlarge the time
23
24 for his Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment due February 16, 2006.
25 and for his Reply to Defendantfs Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
26
· ase 2:03-cv-02537-DGC Document 188 Filed O2/21/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 due February 17,2006. This Motion for Enlargement of Time is made with the knowledge
2 and with the agreement of Defendants’ Counsel. Plaintiff s Counsel expected to be able to
3
finish this project over the President’s Day weekend, but was ill and in bed on Saturday
4
5 and Sunday. Plaintiff moves the Court to enlarge time until Thursday, February 23, 2006
6 for both his Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and his Reply to
7 Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Jud ment. This enlar ement of
8 8
8
time is made for good cause and not for purposes of delay.
9
z
Q 10 Respectfully submitted this 2lS* day of February, 2006.
-
. l l
¤¤ ig § LAW OFFICE O WILLIAM R. HOBSON
E 5 g l2 FX
E 5
d § Z:] 13 Byi _ -
3 if gg W1 1131]] R. Hobson
*5 B Q 14 Attorney for Plaintiff
pa S L1
Ee U is
La
Q 16
5 I7 Original electronically filed and
a copy mailed this
18 2lSt day of February, 2006 to:
19 Peter M. Lantka
Assistant United States Attorney
_ gg Two Renaissance Square
40 N. Central, Ste 1200
gr Phoenix, AZ 85004-4408
Attorney for .S.P.S. and Yvonne Pearson
22
@‘·-\...._ ` ··
23 2
24
25
26
-2-
ase 2:03-cv-02537-DGC Document 188 Filed O2/21/2008 Page 2 of 3

l
2
I 3
4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
ONALD CHAPMAN
9 Case No: CV 03 2537 PHX DGC
10
11 Plaintiff,
l2
13 0HN E. Porrnn, POSTMASTER ORDER
GENERAL, UNITED STATES
14 ' OSTAL SERVICE; NATIONAL
' OSTAL MAIL I·IANDLER’S UNION,
15 VONNE PEARSON, SEPARATELY
· ND IN HER INDIVIDUAL
16 CAPACITY,
17 Defendants.
18
19 Upon Plaintiffs Motion and good cause appearing, it is Ordered enlarging time
20
2 for Plaintiffs Response to Defendanfs Motion for Summary Judgment and his Reply to
l
22 Defendanfs Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment until Thursday,
23 February 23, 2006.
24 By:
25 The Honorable David Campbell
26
il ase 2:O3—cv—O2537-DGC Document 188 Filed O2/21/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02537-DGC

Document 188

Filed 02/21/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02537-DGC

Document 188

Filed 02/21/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02537-DGC

Document 188

Filed 02/21/2006

Page 3 of 3