Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 65.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 15, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 546 Words, 3,437 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35548/187.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona ( 65.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona
1 William R. Hobson, SBN 006887
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM R. HOBSON
2 7303 W. Boston Street
~ Chandler, AZ 85226
3 Telephone No. (480) 705-7550
Facsimile No. (480) 705-7503
I Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 II ONALD CHAPMAN
Case No: CV 03 2537 PHX DGC
l0
1 1
Plaintiff,
12
I3 OHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER ELAINTIEEE MOTION TO
GENERAL, UNITED STATES ENIIAEOE TIME EOE EIS ,
I4 POSTAL SERVICE- NATIONAL EESEONSE TO DEEENIIANTS
OSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION, MOTION EOE SUMMAEY
15 ONNE PEARSON SEPARATELY JUDGMENT AND FOR HIS REPLY
, ND IN HER INDIWDUAL TO DEFENDAN'I"S RESPONSE TO
16 CAPACITY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
17 Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff Donald Chapman ("Chapman") moves for this court to enlarge the time
23
24 for his Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment due February 16, 2006.
25 and for his Reply to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
26 ·
1 ase 2:03-cv-02537-DGC Document 187 Filed O2/15/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 due February 17,2006. This Motion for Enlargement of Time is made without objection
, 2 from Defendants and is made because Plaintiff s Counsel has been, and is working on his
3
brief due to the Arizona Court of Appeals. This brief is due Friday February l7, 2006.
4
5 Plaintiff moves the Court to enlarge time until Tuesday, February 21, 2006 for both his
6 Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and his Reply to Defendant’s
7 Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. This enlargement of time is made
8
for good cause and not for purposes of delay.
9
z
E 10 Respectfully submitted this 15m day of February, 2006.
Q ll
E ‘§ § LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM R. HOBSON
b 0:
"“** 12 at Q
gg? is Byr N" '
B if g" William R. Hobson
**5 B § 14 Attorney for Plaintiff
m Q -E’
0 gn 0
E 15
O
E I6
··¤ 17 Original electronically tiled and
a ctppy mailed this
18 15 ` day ofFebrua1y, 2006 to:
19 Peter M. Lantka
Assistant United States Attorney
gg Two Renaissance Square
40 N. Central, Ste 1200
gi Phoenix, AZ 85004-4408
Attorney for U.S.P-S. a Yvonne Pearson
22 _ _
C2/·—- —
23 =
24
25
26
-2-
ase 2:03-cv-02537-DGC Document 187 Filed O2/15/2006 Page 2 of 3

1
) M
I 3
-
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 · FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
II ONALD CHAPMAN
9 Case No: CV 03 2537 PHX DGC
10
U inamurr,
12
13 0HN E. Porrnn, POSTMASTER ORDER
GENERAL, UNITED STATES
14 ’ OSTAL SERVICE; NATIONAL
' OSTAL MAIL HANDLER’S UNION,
15 ONNE PEARSON, SEPARATELY
· ND IN HER INDIVIDUAL
16 CAPACITY,
17 Defendants.
1 8 _
19 Upon P1aintiff’s Motion and good cause appearing, it is Ordered enlarging time
20
for PIaintiff’ s Response to Defendanfs Motion for Summary Judgment and his Reply to
21
22 Defendanfs Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment until Tuesday,
23 February 21, 2006.
24 By:
25 The Honorable David Campbell
26
·l ase 2:03-cv-02537-DGC Document 187 Filed O2/15/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02537-DGC

Document 187

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02537-DGC

Document 187

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cv-02537-DGC

Document 187

Filed 02/15/2006

Page 3 of 3