·——- HLED ~ -.; Looeeo
—··— RECEIVED COPY necanveo _,,_ G¤l°`¤'
1 JUN 3 0 Zggg JUL 6 2u¤5
j
4
5
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8 UNITED STATES, Ne.: CR-04—373-PHX-lA'l`
9 Pisinurr,
v.
H oel Begley,
12 Defendant. (Third Request)
13 .,., ..... .e
14 Upon motion ofthe defendant, and good cause appearing therefore,
15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED defendantâ€s Motion to Continue Sentencing is GRANTED.
16 This Court—specii’ically findsthat the ends of justice served by granting a continuance
17 outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy hearing. This finding is
111 based upon the Court’s conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would deny the
19 defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise
20 of due diligence. 18 IJ.S.C. §3 l6l(h)(8)(A).
21 IT IS E URQTHER the July 13 , 2005 sentencing date and resetting for
22 __ CQ , ip { {9;: 5 (2 a.n1. in , Arizona.
23 Excludablriydelay lol (h) will connnence on
Q5 Dated uns day ar . ..-ll- jiiir . I -
26
27 United States District Judge
28
. Case 2:04—cr—00373-JAT Document 128 Filed 07/06/2005 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cr-00373-JAT
Document 128
Filed 07/06/2005
Page 1 of 1