1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. MARGARET MOLTER, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CR 04-00539-PHX-MHM
ORDER FOR MOTION TO EXTEND MOTION DEADLINE
Upon motion of the defendant and good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Extend Motion Deadline is granted. This court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting an extension outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This finding is based on the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such an extension would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED extending the current pretrial motions deadline to the 18th day of April, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under U.S.C. ยง3161(h)_____ will commence on ______ for a total of ____ days. DATED this 28th day of March, 2006.
Case 2:04-cr-00539-MHM
Document 88
Filed 03/28/2006
Page 1 of 1