1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Cherie Vigil, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from April 13, 2006 Order having been submitted, and 16 it appearing that the Court did not have jurisdiction to enter its February 10, 2006 Order 17 dismissing the case against Defendant with prejudice, and Defendant's Amended Motion for 18 Recovery of Attorney's Fees and Costs therefore being untimely filed, 19 IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from April 13, 2006 Order. 20 [Doc. # 115] 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Court's Order granting Defendant's 22 Motion for Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. [Doc. # 110] 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Court's Order granting Defendant's 24 Amended Motion for Recovery of Attorney's Fees and Costs. [Doc. # 113] 25 26 27 28
Case 2:04-cr-00874-RGS Document 119 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CR 04-874-PHX-RGS ORDER
DATED this 25th day of September, 2006.