Free Order on Motion to Continue Trial - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2006 at 4:00 p.m. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial.
Case 2:04-cr-01058-FJM Document 118 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Anthony Jamal Rooks, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) United States of America, Case No. CR04-1058-005-PHX-FJM

ORDER

Pursuant to the Defendant's Motion, there being no objection from the Government, or the co-defendant, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED continuing the pretrial motion deadline to November 3, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the trial to December 5, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in Phoenix, Arizona, as to Defendants 2 and 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the Status Conference to November 27,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This finding is based upon the Court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would deny the Defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Excludable time under Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(A), (1)(F) and (8)(A) will commence on October 3, 2006 for a period of 64 days. DATED this 25th day of September, 2006.

-2Case 2:04-cr-01058-FJM Document 118 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 2 of 2