1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Domenic Perino, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 At the request of Defendant, the Government joining in said motion, and supported 18 by good cause based on the statements of the parties, 19 IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant's Motion to Continue the trial date of 20 November 1, 2005 and resetting trial on January 4, 2006 at 9:00 a.m, in Phoenix, Arizona. 21 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best 22 interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 23 This finding is based upon the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a 24 continuance would deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective 25 preparation, taking in account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 26 27 28
Case 2:04-cr-01071-REJ Document 37 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
United States of America, Plaintiff, vs.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CR 04-1071-1-PHX-FJM ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) is found to commence on November 2, 2005 for a total of 63 days. DATED: October 24, 2005
-2Case 2:04-cr-01071-REJ Document 37 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 2 of 2