1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 v. James D. Perino, Defendant. Upon motion of the defendant, no objection from the government, and Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA United States of America, No. CR-04-1071-PHX-FJM ORDER (First Request)
13 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED vacating the motion hearing on Joint 14 15 Motion for Determination of Competency and Insanity at the Time of the Offense 16 set on Tuesday, September 27, 2005. 17 This court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by taking 18 this action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy 19 trial. This finding is based on the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a 20 continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel and 21 would deny the attorney for defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective 22 preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. ยง 23 3161(h)(8)(b)(IV). 24 25 26 27 28
DATED this 22nd day of September, 2005.
Case 2:04-cr-01071-REJ
Document 34
Filed 09/26/2005
Page 1 of 1