1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS ORDERED granting the Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial. 13 [Doc.73]. 14 This Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served 15 by taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public and 16 the defendant in a speedy trial. 17 Court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would 18 unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel and would deny 19 the 20 effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 21 diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1)(F); (h)(8)(A) and (B)(i)(ii)(iv). 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the October 18, 2005 trial, 23 resetting the matter for Tuesday, January 24, 2005, in Phoenix, 24 Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the time for filing pretrial 26 motions to and including December 12, 2005. 27 28 attorney for defendant the reasonable time necessary for This finding is based on the vs. Eric Miguel, Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CR 04-1289-PHX-EHC O R D E R IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:04-cr-01289-EHC
Document 74
Filed 09/28/2005
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a pretrial conference for Wednesday, January 18, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable time is found to exist between October 18, 2005 and January 24, 2006, pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F);(h)(8)(A) and (h)(8)(B)(i)(ii)(iv) for a total of 99 days.
DATED this 27th day of September 2005.
Case 2:04-cr-01289-EHC
Document 74
-2Filed 09/28/2005
Page 2 of 2