Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1
3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
5
_ 6 Ernest E. Peterson, et ali, N0. CIV-04-141-PHX-ROS
7 Plaintiffs, ORDER
8 vs. C C ‘
10 America West Airlines, et al.,
Defendants.
11
I 12
13 Pending before the Court are Defendants Motion to Amend Answer to Complaint
14 [Doc. #42-1] and Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Complaint [Doc. #43-1], tiled in
15 April 2005. No response has been filed by the Defendants. The Court will summarily grant
16 the Motions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.2(i). §;e,_e,g,, Merrit y. United States, No. CIV- .
17 94-1262-PHX-SMM,__l996 WL 650120, at *2 (D. Ariz. June 1, 1995) (summarily granting
18 motion to amend complaint pursuant to former Local Rule l.l0(i) based on defendant’s
19 failure to respond to motion).
20 Accordingly,
21 ITIIS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Answer to Complaint [Doc. #42-
22 1] and- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Complaint [Doc. #43-1] are hereby
23 GRANTED. A
25 DATE _ . ¤ _ ,...-.,...n an A .
it ’ zo
C 27 . ,_;¤,,§>/. ` ,
’ os . i· ver
· 28 United tates District Judge
Case 2:04-cv—00141-ROS Document 53 Filed 07/27/2005 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:04-cv-00141-ROS

Document 53

Filed 07/27/2005

Page 1 of 1