Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Subparagraph (i) provides: 26 27 28 If a motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements of this Rule, or if the opposing party does not serve and file the required answering memoranda, or if counsel for any party fails to appear at the time and place assigned for oral argument, such nonDocument 18 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Keith Robert Barden, Plaintiff, vs. Dora B. Schriro; et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CIV 04-0138-PHX-EHC (GEE) ORDER

The defendant, Dora B. Schriro, has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. The plaintiff (now known as Katherine Elizabeth Barden) is advised of the following specific provisions of Local Civil Rule 7.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona: Subparagraph (e) provides: Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive of attachments.

Case 2:04-cv-00138-EHC-GEE

1 2

compliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. In other words, the plaintiff's response to the defendant's motion may not exceed

3 seventeen (17) pages without the prior permission of the court. Furthermore, the plaintiff 4 should be aware that his failure to respond to the defendant's motion might result in the entry 5 of final judgment against him without a full trial. 6 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 8 1. Response - The plaintiff shall have until November 8, 2005, to file a response to 9 the defendant's motion. 10 2. Reply - The defendant shall have fifteen days from service of the responsive 11 memorandum within which to file a reply. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case 2:04-cv-00138-EHC-GEE Document 18 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 2 of 2

DATED this 3rd day of October, 2005.