Free Lodged Proposed Document - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Morgan & Morgan, P.A. Clay M. Townsend, admitted pro hac vice 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Attorneys for the Neal Plaintiffs Rosenquist & Associates Anders Rosenquist, Jr. #002724 Florence M. Bruemmer #019691 80 E. Columbus Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Plaintiff Meadowlark Lemon Garvey, McNeil & McGillivray Edward R. Garvey, admitted pro hac vice 634 W. Main Street, Suite 101 Madison, WI 53703 Telephone: (608) 256-1003 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants Harlem Globetrotters Int' Inc. and Mannie L. & Catherine Jackson l, Dreier LLP Ira S. Sacks, admitted pro hac vice 499 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 328-6100 [email protected] Attorneys for GTFM, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Meadowlark Lemon, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc., et al. Defendants. Nos. CV-04-0299 PHX DGC and CV-041023 PHX DGC
JOINT PROPOSED FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489

Filed 11/15/2006

Page 1 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

The following is the joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order to be considered at the Final Pretrial Conference set for December 6, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. A. TRIAL COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES Plaintiff Meadowlark Lemon: Anders Rosenquist Florence M. Bruemmer Rosenquist & Associates 80 East Columbus Phoenix, AZ 85012 Phone(480) 488-0102 Fax: (480) 488-2075 Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Plaintiff Curly Neal, et al.: Clay Townsend, Esq. Keith Mitnik, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Phone:(407) 420-1414 Fax: (407) 425-8271 Email: [email protected] Robert W. Goldwater, III, Esq. The Goldwater Law Firm, P.C. 15333 North Pima Road, #225 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Defendants Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc & Mannie L. & Catherine Jackson: Edward R. Garvey, Esq. Christa Westerberg, Esq Garvey, McNeil & McGillivray 634 W. Main Street Suite # 101 Madison, WI 53703 Phone: (608) 256-1003 Fax: (608) 256-0933 Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Ray K. Harris
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 2 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 2 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Alec R. Hillbo Fennemore Craig, P.C. 3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 2600 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Phone: (602) 916-5000 Fax: (602) 916-5614 Email(s): [email protected] and [email protected] Karl M. Tilleman, Esquire P. Bruce Converse, Esquire Steptoe & Johnson Collier Center 201 East Washington Street, 16th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85004 Phone: (602) 257-5244 Fax: (602) 257-5299 Emails: [email protected] and [email protected] Defendant GTFM, LLC: Ira S. Sacks, Esq. Safia A. Anand, Esq. Dreier, LLP 499 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: (212) 328-6100 Fax: (212) 328-6101 Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Joel L. Herz, Esq. Law Offices of Joel L. Herz La Paloma Corporate Center 3573 E. Sunrise Dr., Suite # 215 Tucson, AZ 85718-3206 Phone: (520) 529-8080 Fax: (520) 529-8077 Email: [email protected] B. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 1. Jurisdiction in this case is based on the Court' supplemental jurisdiction of s state law claims under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 3 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 3 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2. Jurisdiction is disputed because Defendants contend that it is an abuse of discretion for this Court to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. C. STIPULATIONS AND UNCONTESTED FACTS AND LAW The following material facts are admitted by the parties and require no proof: 1. Plaintiffs played basketball for the Harlem Globetrotters at various times between 1947 to 1991. 2. Defendant GTFM, LLC (hereinafter "GTFM" or "FUBU") produced and sold clothing (hereinafter the "FUBU/HGI Apparel"), some of which contained Plaintiffs' names, under a licensing agreement with Defendant Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc. (hereinafter "HGI"). 3. The FUBU/HGI license agreement was signed in 2002 and has since expired by its terms. The following material facts, although not admitted, will not be contested at trial by evidence to the contrary: 1. Each of the Plaintiffs signed one or more Player Contracts that discussed the Globetrotters'use of the players'names and likenesses (rights of publicity). 2. HGI sent payments to each of the Plaintiffs based on the sales of the FUBU/HGI Apparel. The following issues of law are uncontested and stipulated to by the parties: 1. Arizona' Common Law Right of Publicity applies. Pooley v. National Holes in-One Association, 89 F.Supp.2d 1108, 1111 (D.Ariz. 2000). D. CONTESTED ISSUES OF FACT AND LAW The following are the material issues of fact to be tried and decided: 1. Whether Defendants received an advantage from the use of Plaintiffs' names on

the FUBU/HGI Apparel.
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 4 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 4 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
4. the Apparel. 3. Apparel. 2.

a. Plaintiffs Contend:

Defendants used Plaintiffs' identities for marketing

and received a commercial advantage as well as a benefit from the use of Plaintiffs identities. b. Defendants Contend: Consumers did not purchase the FUBU/HGI Apparel because Plaintiffs' names and likenesses appeared on it, with the possible exception of apparel bearing Plaintiff Lemon' name. s Whether Plaintiffs consented to the use of their names on the FUBU/HGI Apparel. a. Plaintiffs Contend: Plaintiffs did not consent as they never signed any

agreements at all related to publicity rights or endorsements with Defendants. b. Defendants Contend: Plaintiffs consented to the use of their names on merchandise through player contracts, which granted HGI' predecessors s their right of publicity, and through their conduct. Whether Plaintiffs were damaged by HGI and FUBU' use of their name on the s

a. Plaintiffs Contend:

Defendants should disgorge all profits, or

alternatively, pay a minimum of 25% royalty. b. Defendants Contend: Plaintiffs suffered no actual injury and cannot legitimately claim Defendants'profits as damages. The proper amount of profits, if any, that can be attributed to Plaintiffs' names on

a. Plaintiffs Contend:

Total sales for all Plaintiffs that Plaintiffs can

determine are $12,183,956.00.

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 5 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 5 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

b. Defendants Contend: None, with the possible exception of at most $52,205.22 in profits that can be attributed to the use of Plaintiff Lemon' s name on the Apparel. The following are the issues of law to be determined: 1. Whether Plaintiffs granted HGI' predecessors a license in their publicity rights, s

which HGI could then sublicense to FUBU for the FUBU/HGI Apparel. a. Plaintiffs Contend: Plaintiffs granted minimal publicity rights for use at

games, subject to their approval for endorsements, and subject to Collective Bargaining Agreements, and did not consent to HGI' and s FUBU' use. Any alleged grants to HGI' predecessors were extinguished s s by bankruptcy, never acquired by HGI, failed for lack of consideration, and were unconscionable. s b. Defendants Contend: Plaintiffs granted HGI' predecessors a license to use their publicity rights for Globetrotters-related purposes through contracts they signed as players. 2. Whether Plaintiffs' suit is barred by the doctrine of laches. a. Plaintiffs Contend: Defendants have never made a similar exploitation of Plaintiffs identities. Plaintiffs' claims were filed within the Statute of Limitations. Defendants were not prejudiced. b. Defendants Contend: Plaintiffs' claim for damages is barred by laches because they unreasonably delayed suit and Defendants were prejudiced by Plaintiffs'delay. 3. Whether Plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages. a. Plaintiffs Contend: There is clear and convincing evidence of

Defendants'conscious disregard of Plaintiffs'rights.
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 6 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 6 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

b. Defendants Contend: Plaintiffs are not entitled to punitive damages under Arizona law. Each party shall file a short trial brief on all contested issues of law contemporaneously with the filing of the Proposed Final Pretrial Order. E. LIST OF WITNESSES 1. The following witnesses shall be called at trial: a. Plaintiffs' Witnesses: i. Name: Address: Daymond Aurum GTFM, LLC 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6617 New York, NY 10118 Fact Mr. Aurum is a fact witness and a party representative. He shall testify to all aspects of this dispute, including information provided in his deposition and information regarding the marketing, promotion and advertising of the Harlem Globetrotter apparel line. Mr. Aurum will be called at trial. Larry Blenden, Esq. GTFM, LLC 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6617 New York, NY 10118 Fact Mr. Blenden is a fact witness and party representative of GTFM. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will be called at trial. He has information concerning the sale and distribution of the Harlem Globetrotter apparel and information of the License Agreement. Robert Hall c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

ii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

iii.

Name: Address:

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 7 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 7 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Fact Mr. Hall is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will testify to his playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' s and 1970' his career after the Globetrotters, his s, knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. Marques Haynes c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Fact Mr. Haynes is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will testify to his playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' and 1970' his career after the s s, Globetrotters, his knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. Catherine Jackson 46 Gulf Stream Las Vegas, NV 89113 Fact Ms. Jackson is a fact witness and a party. She will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in her deposition and has information regarding the Harlem Globetrotters, the Agreement, and HGI contracts. Mannie Jackson Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc. 400 E. Van Buren Ave., Ste. 300, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Fact Ms. Jackson is a fact witness and a party. She will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition and has information regarding the Harlem Globetrotters, the Agreement, and HGI contracts.

iv.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

v.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

vi.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 8 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 8 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

vii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Cynthia Lemon c/o Anders Rosenquist & Assoc. 80 E. Columbus Phoenix, AZ 85012 Fact Ms. Lemon is a fact witness. She will testify to all aspects of this case. She will testify to Meadowlark playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' s and 1970' Meadowlark' career after the s, s Globetrotters, her knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. George Meadowlark Lemon c/o Anders Rosenquist & Assoc. 80 E. Columbus Phoenix, AZ 85012 Fact Mr. Lemon is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his depositions. He will testify to playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' and 1970' his career after the s s, Globetrotters, his knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. Colleen Olson, f/k/a Colleen Lenihan 1435 W. School #2 Chicago, IL 60657 Fact Ms. Lenihan is a fact witness. She will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition and has information regarding the Harlem Globetrotters, the Agreement, and HGI contracts. Fred Neal c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Fact Mr. Neal is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will testify to his

viii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

ix.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

x.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 9 -Filed 11/15/2006

Page 9 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' s and 1970' his career after the Globetrotters, his s, knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. xi. Name: Address: Rose Neal c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Fact Ms. Neal will testify to the business transactions of "Curly" Neal, and his income and earning capability. She is the wife of Curly Neal and was his manager. She will testify first hand to the relationship between Curly and Mannie and certain transactions involving Curly Neal, the Globetrotters and Mannie Jackson. Larry Rivers c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Fact Mr. Rivers is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will testify to his playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' and 1970' his career after the s s, Globetrotters, his knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. James Sanders c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Fact Mr. Sanders is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will testify to his playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' and 1970' his career after the s s,

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xiii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 10 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 10 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Globetrotters, his knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. xiv. Name: Address: Michael Syracuse Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc. 400 E. Van Buren Ave., Ste. 300, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Fact Mr. Syracuse is a fact witness and a party and a party representative. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition and has information regarding the Harlem Globetrotters, the Agreement with GTFM, and HGI contracts. Dallas Thornton c/o Clay Townsend, Esq. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Ave, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 Fact Mr. Thornton is a fact witness and a party. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition. He will testify to his playing with the Harlem Globetrotters in the 1960' and 1970' his career after the s s, Globetrotters, his knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the clothing line. Michael Syracuse Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc. 400 E. Van Buren Ave., Ste. 300, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Fact Mr. Syracuse is a fact witness and a party and a party representative. He will testify to all aspects of this case including information provided in his deposition and has information regarding the Harlem Globetrotters, the Agreement with GTFM, and HGI contracts. Governor Vaughn 6835 South 18th Place Phoenix, AZ 85042

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xv.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xvi.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xvii.

Name: Address:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 11 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 11 of 43

1 2 3 4
xviii.

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Fact Mr. Vaughn is a fact witness. He will be called at trial. Mr. Vaughn will testify consistent with the issues raised in his deposition and will testify to his work with the Harlem Globetrotters. Bruce Weisfeld GTFM, LLC 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6617 New York, NY 10118 Fact Mr. Weisfeld is a fact witness and a party representative. He will be called at trial. He will testify to all aspects of this, including information provided in his deposition and information regarding the marketing, promotion and advertising of the Harlem Globetrotter apparel line. Kitty Hall 9000 E. Jefferson # 410 Detroit, MI 48214 Fact Ms. Hall is a fact witness. She will be called at trial. She shall testify to facts surrounding the relationship of Robert Hall with HGI and Mannie Jackson. Joan Haynes 3213 Uxbridge Lane Plano, TX 75025 Fact Ms. Haynes is a fact witness. She will be called at trial. She is the wife of Marques Haynes. She will testify to facts surrounding Marques Haynes relationship with Mannie Jackson. Oliver Phipps 2970 Bridgehampton Lane Orlando, FL 32812 Fact Mr. Phipps is a fact witness. He will be called at trial. He will testify to facts surrounding the investigators location, purchase infirming garments and calculation of damages.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xix.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xx.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xxi.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 12 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 12 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
vi.
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

b. Defendants' Witnesses: i. Name: Meadowlark Lemon Address: c/o Rosenquist & Associates 80 E. Columbus Phoenix, AZ 85012 Fact/Expert: Fact Testimony: Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. ii. Name: Address: Fred Neal c/o Morgan and Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Fact Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. Larry Rivers c/o Morgan and Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Fact Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. Dallas Thornton c/o Morgan and Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Fact Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. Robert Hall c/o Morgan and Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Fact Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. Marques Haynes

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

iii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

iv.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

v.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Name:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 13 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 13 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

c/o Morgan and Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Fact Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. James Sanders c/o Morgan and Morgan, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32801 Fact Factual testimony regarding his player contracts and the use of his name and likeness by HGI. Mannie Jackson 400 E. Van Buren Ave., Ste. 300, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement, the player contracts, and the Harlem Globetrotters'past uses of Plaintiffs'names and likenesses. Michael Syracuse 400 E. Van Buren Ave., Ste. 300, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement, the player contracts, and the Harlem Globetrotters'past uses of Plaintiffs'names and likenesses. Colleen Olson, f/k/a Colleen Lenihan 1435 W. School #2 Chicago, IL 60657 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement, the player contracts, and the Harlem Globetrotters'past uses of Plaintiffs'names and likenesses. Lawrence Blenden 350 5th Avenue, Suite 6617

vii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

viii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

ix.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

x.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xi.

Name: Address:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 14 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 14 of 43

1 2 3 4
xii. Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

New York, NY 10118 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement, the negotiation of said agreement and sales of the FUBU/HGI Apparel. Daymond Aurum 350 5th Avenue, Suite 6617 New York, NY 10118 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement and sales and marketing of the FUBU/HGI Apparel.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

2. The following witnesses may be called at trial: a. Plaintiffs' Witnesses: i. Name: Address: Sandra Abalos Abalos & Associates 7150 N. 16th Street Phoenix, AZ 85020 Fact Ms. Abalos shall testify to documents provided by Defendant' She is a CPA and will testify to s. promise of production by GTFM. She may be called at trial. She is a fact witness. Peter Gallo GPO Box 7278 Hong Kong SAR China Fact Mr. Gallo is a fact witness. He will be called at trial. He shall testify to facts surrounding the sale of apparel worldwide. Lou Dunbar 2425 Guilbeau Lane Seabrook, TX 77586 Fact He is a fact witness. He will be called at trial. Mr. Dunbar will testify about the issues raised in his deposition and will testify to his work with the Harlem Globetrotters.

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

ii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

iii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 15 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 15 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

iv.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

James Todd Smith, a/k/a LL Cool J c/o Robert S. Meloni, Esq. 1350 Avenue of the Americans, Suite 3100 New York, NY 10019 Fact Mr. LL Cool J may testify to his ownership interest in GTFM, LLC and lawsuit with FUBU/GTFM, LLC/ regarding failure to pay royalties. He may be called at trial. He is a fact witness. Norman Weisfeld GTFM, LLC 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6617 New York, NY 10018 Fact Mr. LL Cool J may testify to his ownership interest in GTFM, LLC and lawsuit with FUBU/GTFM, LLC/ regarding failure to pay royalties. He may be called at trial. He is a fact witness. Ben Green Address unknown Fact Mr. Green may be called. Mr. Green is the author of the book "Spinning the Globe" and will testify to admissions and statement made by Mannie Jackson made in the course of writing the book regarding Meadowlark Lemon and FUBU sales. Phillip Crandall 4505 W. Atlantic Blvd., # 1607 Coconut Creek, FL 33066 Fact Mr. Crandall is a fact witness. He may be called at trial. He may testify to information gathered while writing article for magazine on HGI. Roy Disney c/o Shamrock Holdings 4444 Lakeside Drive Burbank, CA 91505 Fact

v.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

vi.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

vii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

viii.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 16 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 16 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ii.
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Testimony:

Mr. Disney is a fact witness. He will be called at trial. He shall testify to facts surrounding the purchase of operations of HGI by Shamrock Holdings Corporation. Robert Perille c/o Shamrock Holdings 4444 Lakeside Drive Burbank, CA 91505 Fact Mr. Perille is a fact witness. He may be called at trial. He may testify to facts surrounding the sale and relationship of HGI, Mannie Jackson and new owner, Shamrock Holdings Inc. Michael A. DiLoreto, Jr. c/o Shamrock Holdings 4444 Lakeside Drive Burbank, CA 91505 Fact Mr. DiLoreto is a fact witness. He may be called at trial. He may testify to facts surrounding the purchase of operations of HGI by Shamrock Holdings Corporation. Edward Garvey, Esquire 634 West Main Street Suite 101 Madison, WI 53703 Fact/Expert: Fact Mr. Garvey is counsel for Defendants. Factual testimony regarding all facts and proceedings surrounding this instant matter.

ix.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

x.

Name: Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

xi.

Name: Address:

Testimony:

b. Defendants' Witnesses: i. Name: Address: Kelly Tinberg Navigant Consulting 201 East Washington Street, Ste. 1700 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Expert Expert testimony regarding sales of the FUBU/HGI Apparel. Jeff Munn

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Name:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 17 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 17 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Address:

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc. 400 E. Van Buren Ave., Ste. 300, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement, the player contracts, and the Harlem Globetrotters'past uses of Plaintiffs'names and likenesses. Bruce Weisfeld 350 5th Avenue, Suite 6617 New York, NY 10118 Fact Factual testimony regarding the FUBU/HGI License agreement, sales of the FUBU/HGI Apparel and the accounting of profits.

iii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

3. The following witnesses are unlikely to be called at trial: a. Plaintiffs' Witnesses: i. Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony: Custodian of Records Supreme Court of the State of New York 60 Centre Street New York, NY 10007 Fact The Custodian of Records is a fact witness. It is unlikely he or she will be called at trial. He or she is able to testify to authenticity of documents in the case of James Todd Smith p/k/a LL Cool J v. GTFM, et al. Custodian of Records United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Little Rock Division Fact The Custodian of Records is a fact witness. It is unlikely he or she will be called at trial. He or she is able to testify to the authenticity of documents in the IBC Bankruptcy case. Ted Nikolis c/o Royal Bank of Scotland

ii.

Name:

Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

iii.

Name: Address:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 18 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 18 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Fact/Expert: Testimony:

101 Park Avenue, Room 10 New York, NY 10178 Fact Mr. Nikolis is a fact witness. He may be called. Mr. Nikolis will testify to all aspects of his deposition and the purchase by Mannie Jackson of the Harlem Globetrotters. Phillip Anderson 111 Center Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Fact Mr. Anderson is a fact witness. He may be called at trial. He may testify to all facts regarding the case entitled Ausbie and Neal vs. Harlem Globetrotters, Inc. et al., and if necessary, authenticity of documents. Phillip Anderson 111 Center Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Fact Mr. Anderson is a fact witness. He may be called at trial. He may testify to all facts regarding the case entitled Ausbie and Neal vs. Harlem Globetrotters, Inc. et al., and if necessary, authenticity of documents. Jerry Saperstein Address unknown. Fact Mr. Saperstein is a fact witness. He probably will not testify. He would testify to the history of the Harlem Globetrotters. Paul Horton 162 Canterbury Lane Fairfield, CT 06825 Fact Mr. Horton is a fact witness. He will be called at trial. He shall testify to facts surrounding the Bankruptcy when Mannie Jackson bought HGI out of Bankruptcy.

iv.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

v.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

vi.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

vii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 19 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 19 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

b. Defendants' Witnesses: i. Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony: Ted Nikolis 35 East 30th Street New York, NY 10016 Fact Factual testimony regarding the 1993 sale of the Harlem Globetrotters to HGI. Paul Horton 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 Fact Factual testimony regarding the 1993 sale of the Harlem Globetrotters to HGI.

ii.

Name: Address: Fact/Expert: Testimony:

Each party understands that it is responsible for ensuring that the witnesses it wishes to call to testify are subpoenaed. Each party further understands that any witness a party wishes to call shall be listed on that party' list of witnesses; the party cannot rely on the witness having been listed s or subpoenaed by another party. F. LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. The following exhibits are admissible in evidence and may be marked in evidence by the Clerk: a. Plaintiffs'Exhibits: 134 Contract dated July 15, 1971 between Curly Neal and Harlem Globetrotters 135 Contract dated September 8, 1976, between Curly Neal and Harlem Globetrotters 136 Contract dated September 15, 1977 between Curly Neal and Harlem Globetrotters 137 Letter dated August 2, 1979, from Stan Greeson to Curly Neal re amendment to Contract 138 Letter dated September 28, 1981 from Arthur Harvey to Curly Neal re: amendment to Contract 139 Letter dated August 31, 1981 from Arthur Harvey to Curly Neal re: amendment to Contract 142 Contract dated October 4, 1983 between Curly Neal and Harlem Globetrotters
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 20 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 20 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

560 Years Chart Plaintiff Played/Coached with HG (1 page) b. Defendants'Exhibits: Plaintiffs agree that all of Defendants'exhibits are admissible in evidence and may be marked into evidence by the Clerk, with the exception of Exhibits 1044, 1087, 1089, 1094, 1095, and 1096, to which Plaintiffs have listed their specific objections below. 2. As to the following exhibits, the parties have reached the following stipulations: a. Plaintiff' Exhibits: s b. Defendant' Exhibits: s Plaintiffs stipulate to the admissibility of all of Defendants' exhibits at trial, with the exception of Exhibits 1044, 1087, 1089, 1094, 1095, and 1096, to which Plaintiffs have listed their specific objections below. 3. As to the following exhibits, the party against whom the exhibit is to be offered objects to the admission of the exhibit and offers the objection stated below: a. Plaintiffs'Exhibits: Defendants object to the Plaintiffs' exhibits as set forth in the chart attached hereto as Schedule A. The reasons for the specific objections listed are as follows: 1. Defendants object to PX 1-2, 5, 10-12, 14, 20, 23-25, 29, 32-33, 40, 42, 5859, 67-68, 70, 72, 83, 85, 141, 143-146, 156, 163, 169, 186-188, 191, 334, 347, 348-365, 369, 379, 390- 391, 501, 503, 511, 519-520, 530, 533-537, 540, 543-544, 549, 551, 554, 557-558 and 570-571 as Improper Composites or IC because each such exhibit contains more than one separate document and has been improperly designated as a single exhibit. 2. Defendants object to PX 1-6, 15-18, 21, 26-28, 32, 34-43, 45- 46, 53-57, 60-67, 72-84, 86-117, 120-132, 140-141, 143-161, 163-169, 181-191, 334-346, 348-365, 368-375, 377, 383-391, 396-397, 500-501, 504-512, 515, 518-520, 522-526, 529, 531533, 537, 541-542, 548-552, 555-558, 561-569 and 571 on Relevance or R grounds because each such exhibit does not tend to prove any of the four elements of a right to publicity claim. 3. Defendants object to PX 22-23, 30-31, 33, 47-52, 58-59, 68-71, 118-119, 133, 162, 169- 180, 192-200, 347-348, 351-358, 360-361, 363-367, 376- 378, 513-514,
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 21 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 21 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

527-528, 530, 534-536, 538-540, 544-545, 553 and 572-576 on Relevance or R grounds because each such exhibit does not tend to prove any of the four elements of a right to publicity claim because there has been no showing that Defendants' alleged use of Plaintiff's name, alleged number or caricature on the style listed or shown was sufficient to identify that Plaintiff or that the alleged appropriation was for Defendants' advantage, i.e., that consumers bought the FUBU/HGI Apparel style listed or shown as a result of Defendants' use, and that Defendants profited as a result of that use. 4. Defendants object to PX 3, 16, 28-29, 33-34, 43, 62, 64-66, 72, 74, 78, 85, 87, 92, 116, 169, 171-173, 197, 387-388, 393-395, 398 and 570 on Incomplete or Inc. grounds because each such exhibit does not contain all of the pages contained in the original document. 5. Defendants object to PX 4-5, 31, 55, 58-59, 68-69, 75-84, 88-103, 105133, 140-141, 143-168, 170-180, 192-195, 197-198, 376, 378, 541, 573 and 577 on Not Timely Disclosed or Disc. grounds because each such exhibit was not disclosed as required by Court orders or rules. 6. Defendants object to PX 7-9, 19-20, 22, 29, 44, 106, 110, 192, 194, 200, 347- 365, 376-379, 396-397, 501-503, 512-513, 515-517, 519, 521, 537, 543, 545-547, 554, 557, 559, 562, 570 and 573 on Duplicate or Dupe grounds because each such exhibit is a duplicate of another exhibit. 7. Defendants object to PX 12-15, 21-23, 25-28, 31, 33-37, 39, 41-43, 45, 4752, 54-72, 74, 79-80, 82-90, 92-133, 140-141, 143-168, 170-192, 195- 200, 335-344, 346367, 370-371, 376-378, 387, 503-511, 514, 518-519, 522, 525-542, 544, 546-553, 555556, 558, 561-569, 571-573 and 577 on Hearsay or H grounds because each such exhibit represents an out of court statement by a party other than defendants. 8. Defendants object to PX 364 on Hearsay or H grounds because said exhibit represents a deposition of a person subject to subpoena power. 9. Defendants object to PX 14, 24-25, 40, 56, 73, 83, 85, 144-146, 195, 364, 369, 379, 382, 389-391, 513, 533-534, 536, 540, 546, 549, 551, 557, 570 and 572 on Improper Description or ID grounds because each such exhibit's description fails to accurately describe the exhibit. 10. Defendants object to PX 29-31, 170-173, 376-378 and 577 on FRE 403 grounds because each such exhibit is, on balance, more misleading than probative. 11. Defendants object to PX 201-333 on Authenticity or A grounds because each such exhibit lacks proof of chain of custody and defendants have not had a full and fair opportunity to examine such exhibit for authenticity purposes.

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 22 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 22 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

12. Defendants object to PX 201-333 on Relevance or R grounds because each such exhibit does not tend to prove any of the four elements of a right to publicity claim because there has been no showing that Defendants' alleged use of Plaintiff's name, alleged number or caricature on the style listed or shown was sufficient to identify that Plaintiff or that the alleged appropriation was for Defendants' advantage, i.e., that consumers bought the FUBU/HGI Apparel style listed or shown as a result of Defendants' use, and that Defendants profited as a result of that use. 13. Defendants object to PX 60 for lack of foundation because the parties are unclear of what it is. 14. Defendants object to PX 191 because it is illegible.

15. Defendants object to PX 379-398, 519 and 574-576 on grounds that those exhibits violate the Court' July 26, 2006 Order Resetting Pretrial Conference Deadlines s or Vio because those exhibits were first listed by Plaintiffs and/or served on Defendants after November 1, 2006. b. Defendants'Exhibits: Plaintiffs'objections to Defendants'Exhibits are as follows: 1. Exhibit 1044 (chart entitled Inventory: Cost Sheet) which is not Bates stamped and is obviously a business record responsive to Plaintiffs' very first request for production that was never produced to date. Reason: Violation of FRCP 26 and FRE 1006. 2. Exhibit 1087 (E-mail from Toshi to Lawrence Blenden dated 7/21/04 re: Itochu Sales) produced after the deposition of Lawrence Blenden. Reason: Hearsay. 3. Exhibit 1089 (E-mail from Dave Shanks to Ira Sacks dated 8/24/05 re: European Sales) produced after the deposition of Lawrence Blenden. Reason: Hearsay.

22 23 24 25 26
5. Exhibit 1095 (chart entitled Sales and New Profit Analysis by Player). 4. Exhibit 1094 (chart showing LDP Percentages) which was never produced before 10/31/06. Reason: Violation of FRCP 26.

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 23 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 23 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Reason: Violation of FRCP 26 and FRE 1006. 6. Exhibit 1096 (chart entitled Maximum Profits by Plaintiff).

Reason: Violation of FRCP 26 and FRE 1006. The parties shall submit their exhibit lists in writing, five days before trial, in a format to be designated by the Court at the Final Pretrial Conference, in WordPerfect® 9.0 format either by email to [email protected] or on an IBM-compatible computer disk. Each party hereby acknowledges by signing this joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order that any objections not specifically raised herein are waived. G. DEPOSITIONS TO BE OFFERED Plaintiffs list the following depositions to be used at trial:

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1.
Colleen Lenihan: ? Page 7, Lines 7-10 ? Page 10, Lines 22-25 ? Page 11, Lines 2-8 ? Page 12, Lines 9-25 ? Page 13, Lines 1-6 ? Page 17, Lines 12-18 ? Page 22, Lines 22-25 ? Page 23, Lines 2-11, 25 ? Page 24, Lines 2-9 ? Page 25, Lines 13-19 ? Page 26, Lines 20-25 ? Page 27, Lines 2-15 ? Page 29, Lines 7-24 ? Page 32, Lines 2-21 ? Page 33, Lines 20-25 ? Page 34, Lines 2-13 ? Page 35, Lines 10-20 ? Page 36, Lines 3-25 ? Page 37, Line 2 ? Page 42, Lines 14-21 ? Page 45, Lines 25 ? Page 46, Lines 2-25 ? Page 47, Lines 2-9 ? Page 51, Lines 24-25 ? Page 52, Lines 2-3

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 24 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 24 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 54, Lines 10-25 Page 55, Lines 2-17 Page 60, Lines 7-18 Page 62, Lines 9-21 Page 63, Lines 5-8 Page 68, Lines 24-25 Page 69, Lines 2-6 Page 94, Lines 12-25 Page 95, Lines 2-10, 21-25 Page 96, Lines 2-17 Page 98, Lines 8-25 Page 103, Lines 19-25 Page 104, Lines 2-6 Page 105, Lines 4-10 Page 106, Lines 1-21

2. Bruce Weisfeld: ? Page 7, Lines 3-4, 22-25 ? Page 8, Lines 2-6 ? Page 9, Lines 2-9, 16-25 ? Page 10, Lines 2-3 ? Page 31, Lines 5-25 ? Page 36, Lines 12-25 ? Page 40, Lines 16-24 ? Page 42, Lines 11-23 ? Page 43, Lines 1-5 ? Page 46, Lines 21-25 ? Page 46, Lines 1-13 ? Page 50, Lines 15-16,19 ? Page 51, Lines 10-25 ? Page 54, Lines 4-25 ? Page 55, Lines 1-20 ? Page 57, Lines 3-18 ? Page 58, Lines 6-24 ? Page 59, Lines 8-25 ? Page 6o, Lines 1-25 ? Page 63, Lines 8-24 ? Page 64, Lines 19-25 ? Page 65, Lines 1-25 ? Page 66, Lines 1-25 ? Page 67, Lines 1-21 ? Page 68, Lines 1-25 ? Page 69, Lines 8-25 ? Page 82, Lines 23-25 ? Page 83, Lines 1-23
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 25 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 25 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 85, Lines 19-25 Page 86, Lines 1-5 Page 93, Lines 1-17 Page 99, Lines 15-25 Page 100, Lines 1-8 Page 112, Lines 15-19

3. Daymond Aurum: ? Page 7, Lines 5-9, 14-17 ? Page 9, Lines 6-25 ? Page 11, Lines 14-23 ? Page 12, Lines 15-25 ? Page 13, Lines 2-10 ? Page 14, Lines 10-25 ? Page 15, Lines 2-25 ? Page 16, Lines 2-25 ? Page 17, Lines 2-24 ? Page 18, Lines 2-25 ? Page 19, Lines 2-5 ? Page 21, Lines 2-4, 20-23 ? Page 23, Lines 21-24 ? Page 24, Lines 2-5 ? Page 25, Lines 21-25 ? Page 26, Lines 2-25 ? Page 27, Lines 2-8 ? Page 28, Lines 10-14 ? Page 29, Lines 19-23 ? Page 37, Lines 22-25 ? Page 38, Lines 2-13 ? Page 39, Lines 7-19 ? Page 40, Lines 13-21 ? Page 43, Lines 4-23 ? Page 48, Lines 22-25 ? Page 49, Lines 2-15 ? Page 50, Lines 5-10 ? Page 51, Lines 6-25 ? Page 52, Line 2 ? Page 53, Lines 6-7, 20-25 ? Page 54, Lines 2-11 ? Page 61, Lines 13-17 ? Page 62, Line 25 ? Page 63, Lines 2-25 ? Page 64, Lines 2-15, 19-22 ? Page 65, Lines 12-17 ? Page 66, Lines 22-25
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 26 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 26 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
4.

?

Page 67, Lines 1-10

Lawrence Blenden: ? Page 7, Lines 22-24 ? Page 8, Lines 5-6, 13-16,22-25 ? Page 9, Lines 2-3, 4-8 ? Page 11, Lines 5-23 ? Page 21, Lines 4-14 ? Page 23, Lines 12-17 ? Page 25, Lines 8-17, 24-25 ? Page 26, Lines 1-14, 21-25 ? Page 27, Lines 3-13 ? Page 28, Lines 3-20 ? Page 35, Lines 2-25 ? Page 36, Lines 1-18, 23-25 ? Page 37, Lines 1-13 ? Page 38, Lines 6-25 ? Page 39, Lines 2 -11-15 ? Page 48, Lines 3-8 ? Page 49, Lines 12-24 ? Page 52, Lines 20-23 ? Page 53, Lines 19-25 ? Page 54, Lines 2-20 ? Page 68, Lines 9-23 ? Page 77, Lines 13-24 ? Page 83, Lines 23-25 ? Page 84, Lines 1-25 ? Page 85, Lines 5-16 ? Page 87, Lines 21-25 ? Page 88, Lines 2-8 ? Page 93, Lines 22-25 ? Page 94, Lines 2-5 ? Page 100, Lines 2-4, 15-23 ? Page 101, Lines 22-25 ? Page 102, Lines 9-15 ? Page 104, Lines 24-25 ? Page 105, Lines 1-25 ? Page 106, Lines 2 ? Page 117, Lines 7-25 ? Page 118, Lines 1-4, 9-12, 22-25 ? Page 119, Lines 1-25 ? Page 120, Lines 1-4, 8-24 ? Page 121, Lines 1-19 ? Page 122, Lines 2-7, 14-21 ? Page 141, Lines 6-25

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 27 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 27 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
5.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 143, Lines 15-24 Page 148, Lines 15-25 Page 149, Lines 2 Page 158, Lines 23-25 Page 159, Lines 2-25 Page 160, Lines 1-24 Page 166, Lines 22-25 Page 167, Lines 1-8 Page 171, Lines 11-20 Page 174, Lines 17-19 Page 175, Lines 5-9

Meadowlark Lemon: ? Page 13, Lines 8-25 ? Page 14, Lines 1-25 ? Page 15, Lines 1-25 ? Page 16, Lines 1-24 ? Page 37, Lines 24-28 ? Page 38, Lines 1-25 ? Page 39, Lines 2-25 ? Page 36, Lines 1-11 ? Page 40, Lines 7-25 ? Page 41, Lines 1-7 ? Page 45, Lines 11-19 ? Page 46, Lines 23-25 ? Page 47, Lines 1-25 ? Page 51, Lines 15-23 ? Page 53, Lines 18-25 ? Page 54, Lines 1-25 ? Page 56, Lines 10-15 ? Page 57, Lines 7-25 ? Page 58, Lines 1-13 ? Page 59, Lines 7-25 ? Page 60, Lines 1-13 ? Page 67, Lines 24-25 ? Page 68, Lines 1-8 ? Page 70, Lines 14-25 ? Page 71, Lines 1-25 ? Page 77, Lines 13-25 ? Page 78, Lines 1-13 ? Page 81, Lines 7-18 ? Page 85, Lines 6-25 ? Page 86, Lines 1-4 ? Page 89, Lines 9-25 ? Page 90, Lines 1-6, 11-25

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 28 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 28 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 91, Lines 1 Page 97, Lines 1-19 Page 108, Lines 12-25 Page 109, Lines 1-2 Page 110, Lines 3-25 Page 111, Lines 17-25 Page 112, Lines 5-20 Page 116, Lines 17-25 Page 117, Lines 1-11 Page 123, Lines 3-15 Page 125, Lines 1-5, 12-18 Page 128, Lines 6-14 Page 129, Lines 25 Page 130, Lines 1-9, 16-25 Page 131, Lines 1-3 Page 135, Lines 1-24 Page 149, Lines 1-8 Page 151, Lines 12-25 Page 152, Lines 1-25 Page 153, Lines 1-18 Page 154, Lines 4-25 Page 156, Lines 5-25 Page 158, Lines 5-10 Page 163, Lines 12-25 Page 164, Lines 1-13 Page 185, Lines 2-25 Page 186, Lines 1 Page 197, Lines 14-25 Page 198, Lines 1-25 Page 199, Lines 1-14 Page 200, Lines 19-25 Page 202, Lines 15-25 Page 203, Lines 1-18 Page 209, Lines 20-25 Page 210, Lines 1-7 Page 211, Lines 19-25 Page 212, Lines 1-25 Page 213, Lines 12-25 Page 214, Lines 1, 13-15 Page 215, Lines 9-25 Page 216, Lines 15-25 Page 227, Lines 9-25 Page 228, Lines 1-17 Page 231, Lines 14-25 Page 232, Lines 1-3

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 29 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 29 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
6.

? ?

Page 237, Lines 24-25 Page 238, Lines 1-25

Mannie Jackson: ? Page 9, Lines 3-16 ? Page 10, Lines 7-25 ? Page 11, Lines 1-2 ? Page 15, Lines 3-13 ? Page 22, Lines 20-25 ? Page 23, Lines 1-12 ? Page 24, Lines 8-25 ? Page 25, Lines 1-14 ? Page 26, Lines 16-24 ? Page 28, Lines 7-19 ? Page 32, Lines 22-25 ? Page 33, Lines 1-25 ? Page 34, Lines 1-25 ? Page 35, Lines 9-17 ? Page 36, Lines 1-25 ? Page 37, Lines 1-6 ? Page 41, Lines 12-25 ? Page 42, Lines 1-11 ? Page 49, Lines11-25 ? Page 50, Lines 1-7 ? Page 53, Lines 12-25 ? Page 54, Lines 1-25 ? Page 55, Lines 1-25 ? Page 56, Lines 1-26 ? Page 57, Lines 1-25 ? Page 58, Lines 1-14 ? Page 62, Lines 6-13 ? Page 63, Lines 6-22 ? Page 70, Lines 12-25 ? Page 71, Lines 1-8, 20-25 ? Page 75, Lines 4-19 ? Page 78, Lines 16-25 ? Page 79, Lines 1-14 ? Page 82, Lines 13-25 ? Page 92, Lines 8-25 ? Page 93, Lines 2, ? Page 117, Lines 11-21 ? Page 120, Lines 14-25 ? Page 121, Lines 1-25 ? Page 122, Lines 1-25 ? Page 123, Lines 1-8

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 30 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 30 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
8. 7.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 126, Lines 22-25 Page 127, Lines 1-10 Page 128, Lines 15-25 Page 129, Lines 1-25 Page 130, Lines 1, Page 133, Lines 21-25 Page 134, Lines 1-6 Page 135, Lines 1-25 Page 153, Lines 24-25 Page 136, Lines 1-14 Page 138, Lines 3-25 Page 139, Lines 1-25 Page 140, Lines 1-25 Page 141, Lines 1,-15-25 Page 142, Lines 1-15 Page 143, Lines 12-23 Page 144, Lines 9-25 Page 145, Lines 1-11,23-25 Page 146, Lines 1-25 Page 149, Lines 23-25 Page 150, Lines 1-7 Page 159, Lines 18-21 Page 160, Lines 1-25 Page 161, Lines 1-4

Peter Gallo (9/23/05): ? Page 6, Lines 5-8, 18-19, 23-25 ? Page 7, Lines 1-25 ? Page 8, Lines 6-25 ? Page 9, Lines 1-25 ? Page 10, Lines 1-24 ? Page 14, Lines 2-25 ? Page 15, Lines 1-25 ? Page 16, Lines 1-25 ? Page 17, Lines 1-25 ? Page 18, Lines 1-25 ? Page 19, Lines 1-11 ? Page 20, Lines 1-24 Govoner Vaughn (9/15/05): ? Page 4, Lines 11-12 ? Page 5, Lines 2-4, 19-21 ? Page 6, Lines 12-14, 23-25 ? Page 7, Lines 6-13 ? Page 8, Lines 8-10, 18-21 ? Page 10, Lines 14-25

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 31 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 31 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
9.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 11, Line 1 Page 12, Lines 21-25 Page 13, Lines 1-14 Page 14, Lines 16-24 Page 15, Lines 17-22 Page 16, Line 25 Page 17, Lines 1-10 Page 24, Lines 15-16 Page 25, Lines 4, 18-20 Page 26, Lines 20-23 Page 27, Lines 6-25 Page 28, Lines 1-11 Page 29, Lines 18-25 Page 30, Lines 1-18 Page 37, Lines 6-25 Page 38, Lines 1-16 Page 42, Lines 1-8, 12-25 Page 46, Lines 1-6 Page 47, Lines 13-25 Page 48, Lines 1-25 Page 49, Lines 1-25 Page 50, Lines 1-19 Page 53, Lines 6-12 Page 55, Lines 17-25 Page 56, Lines 1-24 Page 62, Lines 20-25 Page 63, Lines 1-8 Page 72, Lines 1-17 Page 75, Lines 9-10 Page 77, Lines 7-9 Page 79, Lines 3-25 Page 80, Lines 1-21 Page 81, Lines 2-25 Page 82, Lines 1-7 Page 83, Lines 14-22 Page 85, Lines 3-5 Page 87, Lines 15-25 Page 88, Line 1

Louis James Dunbar (10/4/05) ? Page 8, Lines 6-8 ? Page 9, Lines 10-13 ? Page 10, Lines 2-4 ? Page 15, Lines 20-25 ? Page 16, Lines 2-7, 12-13

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 32 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 32 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 17, Lines 15-25 Page 18, Lines 1-13, 22-25 Page 20, Lines 1-17 Page 22, Lines 2-14 Page 25, Lines 10-16, 21-25 Page 26, Lines 1, 7, 11-25 Page 27, Lines 2-14, 22-25 Page 28, Lines 1-25 Page 29, Lines 1-25 Page 30, Lines 1-14 Page 31, Lines 4-15 Page 32, Lines 21-25 Page 33, Lines 1-25 Page 34, Lines 1-25 Page 35, Lines 1-12, 21-25 Page 36, Lines 1-25 Page 37, Lines 1-25 Page 38, Lines 1-25 Page 39, Lines 1-25 Page 40, Lines 1-25 Page 41, Lines 1-25 Page 42, Lines 1-25 Page 43, Lines 1-25 Page 44, Lines 1-25 Page 45, Lines 1-21 Page 46, Lines 17-25 Page 47, Lines 1-25 Page 48, Lines 1-11 Page 49, Lines 15-24 Page 54, Lines 2-3, 8-9 Page 55, Lines 5-12 Page 56, Lines 15-25 Page 57, Lines 1-14 Page 58, Lines 2-25 Page 59, Lines 1-9, 18-25 Page 60, Lines 1-14 Page 64, Lines 7-18 Page 65, Lines 9-25 Page 66, Lines 3-25 Page 67, Lines 3-22 Page 68, Lines 7-15 Page 70, Lines 24-25 Page 71, Lines 1-6 Page 72, Lines 14-24 Page 80, Lines 17-22

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 33 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 33 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
11. 10.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 81, Lines 4-14 Page 82, Lines 12-25 Page 83, Lines 1-2, 9-25 Page 84, Lines 1-11, 17-25 Page 85 Lines 1-13 Page 91, Lines 18-20 Page 92, Lines 9-15, 20-25 Page 93, Lines 1-10 Page 94, Lines 2-8, 12-23 Page 95, Lines 3, 7-9 Page 96, Lines 1-21 Page 99, Lines 17-25 Page 100, Lines 1-25 Page 101, 1-9 Page 109, Lines 22-25 Page 110, Lines 1-10 Page 116, Lines 15-22

Theodore Nikolis (8/2/2005) ? Page 7, Lines 17-24 ? Page 8, Lines 9-23 ? Page 14, Lines 4-11 ? Page 15, Lines 2-17 ? Page 17, Lines 11-25 ? Page 18, Lines 2-12 ? Page 19, Lines 14-21 ? Page 20, Lines 16, 23 ? Page 22, Lines 6-10 ? Page 24, Lines 4-16 ? Page 29, Lines 23-25 ? Page 30, Lines 2-21 ? Page 32, Lines 7-14 ? Page 33, Lines 23-25 ? Page 34, Lines 2-23 ? Page 35, Lines 10-25 ? Page 36, Lines 2-25 ? Page 37, Lines 2-24 ? Page 52, Lines 17-25 ? Page 53, Lines 2-14 ? Page 56, Lines 16-23 ? Page 58, Lines 13-25 ? Page 59, Lines 2-17 Paul James Horton (9/23/2005) ? Page 7, Lines 18-19

26

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 34 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 34 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
12. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 8, Lines 5-14 Page 9, Lines 4-25 Page 10, Lines 5-8 Page 13, Lines 16-25 Page 14, Lines 2, 10-17 Page 15, Lines 2-11, 18-21 Page 17, Lines 8-10, 23-25 Page 18, Lines 2-19 Page 20, Lines 10-19 Page 25, Lines 2-25 Page 26, Lines 2-25 Page 27, Lines 2-25 Page 28, Lines 2-25 Page 29, Lines 14-25 Page 30, Lines 2-3, 11-22 Page 32, Lines 21-25 Page 36, Lines 10-25 Page 37, Lines 2-14 Page 38, Lines 13-25 Page 39, Lines 2-9, 13-19 Page 40, Lines 3-9, 14-25 Page 41, Lines 2-16 Page 43, Lines 7-16 Page 53, Lines 24-25 Page 54, Lines 2-16 Page 55, Lines 3-12, 16-25 Page 56, Lines 2-3, 15-25 Page 57, Lines 2-8 Page 60, Lines 16-24 Page 62, Lines 8-11, 22-24 Page 63, Lines 2-23 Page 65, Lines 7-15 Page 66, Lines 14-25 Page 69, Lines 4-12 Page 70, Lines 12-15

Michael Syracuse (5/9/05): Page 9, Lines 3-12 Page 11, Lines 2-9 Page 13, Lines 8-25 Page 14, Lines 2-25 Page 15, Lines 2-3, 17-25 Page 16, Lines 2-24 Page 18, Lines 3-6 Page 19, Lines 6-14

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 35 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 35 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
13.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 21, Lines 23-25 Page 22, Lines 2-5 Page 23, Lines 16-25 Page 24, Lines 2-21 Page 25, Lines 5-21 Page 29, Lines 7-25 Page 30, Lines 2-19 Page 32, Lines 20-24 Page 34, Lines 5-18 Page 36, Lines 17-25 Page 37, Lines 2-3, 24-25 Page 38, Lines 2-7, 12-15 Page 39, Lines 9-11, 21-25 Page 40, Lines 2-6, 18-20 Page 41, Lines 21-25 Page 42, Lines 2-25 Page 43, Lines 2-25 Page 44, Lines 2-25 Page 45, Lines 2-19 Page 46, Lines 23-25 Page 47, Lines 2-19 Page 48, Lines 2-20 Page 49, Lines 24-25 Page 50, Lines 2-14 Page 53, Lines 11-25 Page 54, Lines 2-25 Page 55, Lines 2-25 Page 56, Lines 2-15, 21-25 Page 57, Lines 2-25 Page 58, Lines 2-13 Page 59, Lines 7-25 Page 60, Lines 2-13 Page 63, Lines 8-20 Page 64, Lines 10-25 Page 65, Lines 2-22 Page 70, Lines 14-25 Page 71, Lines 2-7, 13-20 Page 85, Lines 12-25 Page 86, Lines 2-13 Robert Hall (8/23/05): Page 7, Lines 14-15, 19 Page 8, Lines 3-4 Page 9, Lines 8-13, 25 Page 10, Lines 3-16, 19-25

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 36 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 36 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Page 11, Line 3 Page 14, Lines 10-25 Page 15, Lines 3-25 Page 16, Lines 3-5, 14-25 Page 17, Lines 3-11 Page 18, Lines 9-23 Page 21, Lines 9-11 Page 25, Lines 13-19 Page 29, Lines 5-20 Page 30, Lines 9-22 Page 31, Lines 3-25 Page 32, Lines 3-25 Page 35, Lines 5-17 Page 36, Lines 6-25 Page 37, Lines 3-15 Page 39, Lines 8-25 Page 40, Lines 3-16 Page 43, Lines 15-25 Page 44, Lines 3-5 Page 46, Lines 11-25 Page 47, Lines 3-22 Page 50, Lines 12-22 Page 51, Lines 23-25 Page 52, Lines 3-18 Page 60, Lines 21-25 Page 61, Lines 3-14 Page 62, Lines 9-19 Page 64, Lines 18-25 Page 65, Lines 3-25 Page 66, Lines 3-16 Page 68, Lines 9-25 Page 69, Lines 3-10

Defendants list the following depositions to be used at trial:
1. The deposition of Theodore Nikolis a. p. 7, line 17 to p. 8, line 23 b. p. 9, lines 17-23 c. p. 17, lines 11-24 d. p. 22, lines 6-22 e. p. 24, lines 4-20 f. p. 25, line 17 to p. 26, line 16 g. p. 27, line 15 to p. 29, line 10 h. p. 29, line 23 to p. 30, line 9 i. p. 32, lines 7-10 j. p. 33, lines 9-22
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 37 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 37 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

k. p. 39, line 8 to p. 40, line 21 2. The deposition of Paul Horton ­ a. p. 7, lines 18-25 b. p. 8, line 5 to p. 9, line 11 c. p. 10, lines 5-16 d. p. 10, line 22 to p. 11, line 20 e. p. 13, line 16 to p. 14, line 17 f. p. 17, line 13 to p. 18, line 15 g. p. 50, line 15 to p. 51, line 17 h. p. 52, line 12 to p. 53, line 6 i. p. 53, line 24 to p. 55, line 2 j. p. 55, line 16 to p. 56, line 3 k. p. 56, line 15 to p. 57, line 16 l. p. 57, lines 21-25 m. p. 58, lines 5-22

The party offering each deposition shall provide the Court with a copy of the offered deposition testimony. The offering party shall highlight, in color, the portions of the deposition to be offered. Plaintiffs shall highlight in yellow; Defendants shall highlight in blue. Each party hereby acknowledges by signing this joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order that any deposition not listed as provided herein will not be allowed, absent good cause. H. MOTIONS IN LIMINE (JURY TRIAL) Motions in limine shall be filed as separate pleadings and responded to in accordance with the instructions contained in the Order Setting Final Pretrial Conference. I. LIST OF PENDING MOTIONS The following is a list of all pending motions as of November 15, 2006: 1. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude the Analysis of Oliver Phipps from Trial. (Doc. # 427.) 2. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence of Sales Allegedly Violating Plaintiffs' Rights Other Than As Expressly Set Out In The June 27, 2006 Order. (Doc. # 461 and 463.) 3. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Any Allegations of Discovery Abuses. (Doc. # 464-466.)
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 38 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 38 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

4. Defendants' Motion to Strike the New Analyses of Oliver Phipps and Plaintiffs'Joint Supplemental Disclosure Statements. (Doc. # 469-472.) 5. Defendants' Motion to Expedite Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Strike the New Analyses of Oliver Phipps and Plaintiffs' Joint Supplemental Disclosure Statements. (Doc. # 473.) 6. Plaintiffs' Joint Motion for Preadmission of Exhibits and Evidence. (Doc. # 474-475.) J. PROCEDURES FOR EXPEDITING TRIAL NONE K. ESTIMATED LENGTH OF TRIAL Plaintiffs'estimated length of trial: 8 hours for opening statements and closing arguments 60 hours for Plaintiffs'case 14 hours for Defendants'case 4 hours for rebuttal Defendants'estimated length of trial 4 hours for opening statements and closing arguments 18 hours for Plaintiffs'case 14 hours for Defendants'case 4 hours for rebuttal L. JURY DEMAND A jury trial has been requested. The parties stipulate that the request was timely and properly made. M. JOINT PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JOINT PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS, AND PROPOSED FORMS OF VERDICT FOR JURY TRIALS The joint Proposed Jury Instructions, joint Proposed Voir Dire Questions, and Proposed Forms of Verdict have been filed in accordance with the instructions contained in the Order Setting Final Pretrial Conference. N. CERTIFICATIONS
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 39 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 39 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

The undersigned counsel for each of the parties in this action does hereby certify and acknowledge the following: 1. All discovery has been completed. 2. The identity of each witness has been disclosed to opposing counsel. 3. Each exhibit listed herein: (1) is in existence; (2) is numbered; and (3) has been disclosed and shown to opposing counsel. 4. The parties have complied in all respects with the mandates of the Court' s Rule 16 Scheduling Order and Order Setting Final Pretrial Conference. 5. The parties have made all of the disclosures required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (unless otherwise previously ordered to the contrary). 6. The parties acknowledge that once this Proposed Final Pretrial Order has been signed and lodged by the parties, no amendments to this Order can be made without leave of Court. O. INFORMATION FOR COURT REPORTER Each party shall file a "Notice to Court Reporter" one week before trial containing the following information that may be used at trial: 1. Proper names, including those of witnesses. 2. Acronyms. 3. Geographic locations. 4. Technical (including medical) terms, names or jargon. 5. Case names and citations. Each party shall also send (or transmit electronically) to the court reporter a copy of the concordance from key depositions.

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 40 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 40 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

BY

/IRA S. SACKS/ Ira S. Sacks, admitted pro hac vice Safia A. Anand, admitted pro hac vice DREIER LLP 499 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 328-6100 Joel Herz, # 015105 LAW OFFICES OF JOEL L. HERZ 3573 East Sunrise Drive, Suite 215 Tucson, AZ 85718 (520) 529-8080 Attorneys for Defendant GTFM, LLC

BY

/EDWARD R. GARVEY/ Ray K. Harris, # 007408 FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 2600 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2913 (602) 916-5000 Edward R. Garvey, admitted pro hac vice Christa Westerberg, admitted pro hac vice GARVEY McNEIL & McGILLIVRAY, S.C. 634 W. Main St. #101 Madison, WI 53703 (608) 256-1003 Attorneys for Defendants Harlem Globetrotters Int'l, Inc. and Mannie L. & Catherine Jackson

BY

/CLAY M. TOWNSEND/ Clay M. Townsend, admitted pro hac vice Keith Mitnik, admitted pro hac vice MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 20 N. Orange Avenue, 16th Floor Orlando, FL 32802 (407) 420-1414 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Fred Neal, Marques Haynes, Dallas Thornton, Larry Rivers, James Sanders, Robert Hall

BY

/ANDERS ROSENQUIST/ Anders Rosenquist, Jr., # 002724 Florence M. Bruemmer, # 019691 ROSENQUIST & ASSOCIATES 80 E. Columbus Phoenix, AZ 85012 Attorneys for Plaintiff Meadowlark Lemon

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 41 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 41 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that this Proposed Final Pretrial Order jointly submitted by the parties is hereby APPROVED and ADOPTED as the official Pretrial Order of this Court. DATED this ___ day of ______________________, 2006.

___________________________ David G. Campbell United States District Judge

PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 42 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 42 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PHX/RHARRIS/1856658.1/43458.007

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1. I hereby certify that on November 15, 2006, a true and correct copy of the attached document was electronically transmitted to the Clerk' Office using the CM/ECF s System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Safia A Anand [email protected] Florence M Bruemmer [email protected] Edward R Garvey [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Robert Williams Goldwater III [email protected] Ray Kendall Harris [email protected], [email protected] Joel Louis Herz [email protected], [email protected] Alec R Hillbo [email protected], [email protected] Brandon Scott Peters [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Anders V Rosenquist , Jr [email protected] Ira S Sacks [email protected] Clay M Townsend [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected] Christa O Westerberg [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2. I hereby certify that on November 15, 2006, a true and correct copy of the attached document was sent via U.S. Mail, postage paid thereon, to the following parties, at the addresses listed: Keith R. Mitnik Morgan & Morgan PA 20 N. Orange Ave. Suite 1600 Orlando, FL 32802 s/Melody Tolliver

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 489- 43 Filed 11/15/2006

Page 43 of 43