Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

2 l
2 1
4
5 i
6 { IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8 .
9 GERALD BYERLY, No. CV-04-323-PHX-FIM
10 Plaintiff, ORDER l
ll vs.
12
13 DEPUTY WARDEN, etal., §
Defendant.
14
15
16 .
17 The court has before it a joint motion for enlargement ofthe discovery and dispositive
I 18 motion deadlines (doc. 50). But the parties' delay in engaging in discovery was a tactical
19 decision and does not constitute good cause to upset the Rule 16 scheduling order.
20 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED DENYING the joint motion for enlargement ofthe discovery
21 and dispositive motion deadlines (doc. 50).
22 DATED this 27* day of July, 2005.
23 . `**— . n. n n
24 2
25 ’ "/’ §$d§t‘§$é‘SJn‘£’t3E¥‘}Edge
' 26 _
27 .
28 .
Case 2:04-cv-00323-FJIVI Document 54 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:04-cv-00323-FJM

Document 54

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 1 of 1