Free Response - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Dan W. Goldfine (#018788) Adam Lang (#022545) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center 400 East Van Buren Street Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Telephone: (602) 382-6000 Facsimile: (602) 382-6070 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants and Third Party Defendants and

8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

12 13 14 15 16 17

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Grant Woods, Esq. (#006106) GRANT WOODS, P.C. 1726 North Seventh Street Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Telephone: (602) 258-2599 Facsimile: (602) 258-5070 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants and Third Party Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Meritage Homes Corporation, et al.,

18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. Ricky Lee Hancock, et al., Defendants. AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS

Case No. CV-04-0384-PHX-ROS RESPONSE TO RICK HANCOCK'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

Plaintiffs, counterdefendants, and third-party defendants (collectively, "Meritage") respond to Rick and Brenda Hancock, Rick Hancock Homes and RLH Development's (collectively "Rick Hancock Defendants") Request for Leave to Supplement the Record. The Rick Hancock Defendant's have asked this Court for leave to supplement the record in an attempt to provide support for the factual assertions included in there
Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS Document 466 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

Response to Meritage's Motion for Summary Judgment so as to be in compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 56.1(b). The Rick Hancock Defendants had ample opportunity to properly comply with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 56.1(b) before making their Request for Leave. While the Rick Hancock Defendants have requested leave, they have not given any rationale explaining why leave is necessary. Instead, they request leave in the first sentence of their Response to Meritage's Motion to Strike the unsupported facts from their Response to Meritage's Motion for Summary Judgment and then they ignore the request until their conclusion. Thus, the Rick Hancock Defendants have not identified any

reasons or facts giving rise to good cause that would support granting leave to supplement the record. Therefore, leave should be denied. DATED this 9th day of April, 2007. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

By s/ Dan W. Goldfine Dan W. Goldfine Adam Lang One Arizona Center Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendants and

By s/ Grant Woods Grant Woods GRANT WOODS, P.C. 1726 North Seventh Street Phoenix, AZ 85006 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Third Party Defendants

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 466- 2 - Filed 04/09/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 9, 2007, I electronically transmitted the foregoing document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Ivan K. Mathew Mathew & Mathew, P.C. 3300 North Central Avenue, Suite 1730 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Defendants Rick Hancock, Brenda Hancock, Rick Hancock Homes, L.L.C., and RLH Development, L.L.C. Robert M. Frisbee Frisbee & Bostock, PLC 1747 East Morton Avenue Suite 108 Phoenix AZ 85020 Attorneys for Defendant Greg Hancock Kenneth J. Sherk Timothy J. Burke Fennemore Craig, P.C. 3003 N. Central Ave. Suite 2600 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2913 Attorneys for Defendant Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P. in State Court Action s/ Becky Kinningham

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1976239

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 466- 3 - Filed 04/09/2007

Page 3 of 3