Free Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 70.3 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 416 Words, 2,483 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43307/617-2.pdf

Download Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 70.3 kB)


Preview Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona
Meritage Homes Corporation v. Greg Hancock, et aL.

Case No.: CV-04-0384-PHX-ROS

Exhibit No.

Description
Declaration of Lindsey Perez

A

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 617-2

Filed 09/19/2008

Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT "A"

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 617-2

Filed 09/19/2008

Page 2 of 4

Richard G. Erickson (#019066) 2 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center
3 400 E. Van Buren

1 Dan W. Goldfine (#018788)

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202
Facsimile: (602) 382-6070

4 Telephone: (602) 382-6000
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Meritage Corporation

6 7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9
10

Meritage Corporation, a Maryland Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
Greg Hancock,

Case No. CV-04-0384-PHX-ROS

~ ~N
-- cntigo ... WOV"°

~

11

S ~~ 12

DECLARTION OF LINDSEY M. PEREZ

~ ~ooo~

~j~~~~ 13 _y..O t. 2l"
OC ~ ß~Ñ

== :s~ x§ 14
rn ~o. "
o

i:u
Q) g'~

15

Defendants.

16

17 I, Lindsey M. Perez, declare as follows:
18 1. I am at least 18 years of age, and I make this Declaration in the above-

19 captioned matter.
20 2. I am employed with Snell & Wilmer, L.L.p., which represents Plaintiff

21 Meritage Corporation in this matter.
22 3. The process for filing Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Rule 50 Motion for

23 Dismissal or Directed Verdict began before 9 :00 a.m.
24 4. The Response took several minutes to fie due to the number of exhibits that

25 had to be inputted and listed per the United States District of Arizona Electronic Case

26

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 617-2

Filed 09/19/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 Filng Administrative Policies and Procedures ManuaL.
2 5. The reason that the filing was not earlier was due to a transcription error for

3 Allson Sommerhalter's trial testimony. It could not be located because it was
4 inadvertently marked as Desiree Coates' testimony.

5 6. The fiing was expedited without any delay and was completed before the time

6 stamp put on by the District of Arizona.
7 Pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure, I declare under the penalty of perjury and

8 under penalty of possible sanctions, that the foregoing is true and correct.
9
10 Executed on the 19th day of

September, 2008.

~ ~N ~ :;2 12 ~ ~r:
-- cnui°o"- 0

~ 11

-,. u. 0

~ ~g~S5

~~~~~~ 13 _y.. 0 ~ 2t"
QQ ~ "'~N
(J .ê ~

By çlUJPL Lindsey M. Perez

- ..ü-i:¡ 14 9125285.1
i- .. ~ .~-

rn ~o. 15
o

i: ~-c

16
17 18 19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 617-2- 2 - Filed 09/19/2008

Page 4 of 4