Free Motion Hearing - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CIVIL MINUTES

Phoenix Division CV04-400-PHX-PGR Year Case No. Dft # DATE: July 18, 2006

HON: PAUL G. ROSENBLATT

Judge # 7017

Caption: Hypercom Corporation v. Omron Corporation Deputy Clerk: Sandi Fredlund Crt Rptr/ECR: Liz Lemke

Plaintiff's counsel: Sid Leach and Monica Limon-Wynn Defendant's counsel: Ray Harris and David Irmscher ============================================================================= This is the time for discovery dispute hearing and discussion of Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time of the discovery deadline [doc. 129]. Counsel present argument to the Court. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time of the discovery deadlines [doc. 129]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 72] because discovery on the merits had not yet begun when the motion was filed. The motion is denied without prejudice to Omron reasserting the motion if they feel there's a basis to reassert it and it can be done under the Court's current scheduling order.

Time in Court: 33 mins.

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 134

Filed 07/18/2006

Page 1 of 1