IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CIVIL MINUTES
Phoenix Division CV04-400-PHX-PGR Year Case No. Dft # DATE: July 18, 2006
HON: PAUL G. ROSENBLATT
Judge # 7017
Caption: Hypercom Corporation v. Omron Corporation Deputy Clerk: Sandi Fredlund Crt Rptr/ECR: Liz Lemke
Plaintiff's counsel: Sid Leach and Monica Limon-Wynn Defendant's counsel: Ray Harris and David Irmscher ============================================================================= This is the time for discovery dispute hearing and discussion of Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time of the discovery deadline [doc. 129]. Counsel present argument to the Court. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time of the discovery deadlines [doc. 129]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 72] because discovery on the merits had not yet begun when the motion was filed. The motion is denied without prejudice to Omron reasserting the motion if they feel there's a basis to reassert it and it can be done under the Court's current scheduling order.
Time in Court: 33 mins.
Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR
Document 134
Filed 07/18/2006
Page 1 of 1