Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
P HOENIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Hypercom Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Omron Corporation, Defendant The defendant, Omron Corporation ("Omron"), has requested that the Court grant its Opposed Motion For Limited Extension Of Discovery Deadline To Conduct NonExpert Depositions, allowing Omron an extension of time, to and including June 30, 2006, for the limited purpose of deposing certain non-expert witnesses of the plaintiff, Hypercom Corporation ("Hypercom"). The Court, being fully advised, now GRANTS the motion. IT IS ORDERED that Omron shall have to and including June 30, 2006, to depose the non-expert witnesses noticed by Omron for June 28-30, 2006: George Wallner, Chris Alexander, William Dowlin, Jonatan Schmidt, and a Rule 30(b)(6) representative of Hypercom. CAUSE NO. CV04-0400 PHX PGR [PROPOSED] ORDER ON OMRON CORPORATION'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR LIMITED EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE TO CONDUCT NON-EXPERT DEPOSITIONS (FIRST REQUEST)

PHX/RHARRIS/1805277.1/12623.001

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 129-4

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 1