Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

INDEX OF EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO HYPERCOM CORPORATION'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO OMRON CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE FROM THE ITC ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 ITC Notice of Commission Decision Not to Review Order and Initial Determination Terminating Investigation dated July 8, 2005 Excerpts from Verve's Reply to Staff's Joint Response to Respondents' Motions for Sanctions and Order to Show Cause dated April 1, 2005 Printout of OUII 337 Investigative History Verve LLC's Motion to Withdraw the Complaint and Terminate the Present Investigation dated February 11, 2005 Commission Investigative Staff's and Complainant Verve LLC's Joint Motion for Termination for the remand Proceedings, dated December 12, 2006 Order No. 63: Revised Sanctions Order, dated February 6, 2007 Office of Unfair Import Investigation's Response to "Verve LLC's, Simon Galasso & Frantz, PLC's and Raymond M. Galasso's Petition for Review of Order 63 Revised Sanctions [sic] Order, dated April 4, 2007 Respondent Hypercom Corporation's Response to Verve LLC's, Simon Galasso & Frantz, P.C's and Raymond M. Galasso's Petition for Review of Order 63 Revised Sanctions Order, dated April 6, 2007 ITC Order No. 48: Imposing Sanctions, Jointly and Severally, on Complainant Verve; Simon, Galasso and Frantz; and Raymond Galasso and Kevin Imes dated June 7, 2005 [previously filed with this Court (doc. 61), and re-filed with the Court as Exhibit A to doc #169] ITC Order No. 49: Initial Determination Granting Complainant Verve's Motion to Withdraw the Complaint dated June 8, 2005 [previously filed with this Court as Exhibit 43 to Hypercom's Statement of Facts in Opposition to Omron's MSJ (doc #85)]

Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7

Exhibit 8

Order No. 48

Order No. 49

1988254

Case 2:04-cv-00400-PGR

Document 204-2

Filed 04/30/2007

Page 1 of 1