Free Supplement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 56.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: July 19, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 469 Words, 3,031 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43341/207.pdf

Download Supplement - District Court of Arizona ( 56.4 kB)


Preview Supplement - District Court of Arizona
·‘“ · E
FILED __LODGED
, i____RECE|\/ED ____,,_COPY
1 i David B. Rosenbaum, Atty. No. 009819
Dawn L. Dauphine, Atty. No. 010833 JUL. 1 7 ZUU6
2 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.
2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 etiétivt 0 s DiaTFa1oT COURT
3 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2794 _ if;\§TF1IOT GF AFi\§%'$g;Uw
Telephone: (602) 640-9000 @`°`-T-2--—--——»·—~··—·~»= c
4 [email protected] ` `
5 ddau [email protected]
Michael L. Banks, Pro Hac Vice
6 William J. Delany, Pm Hac Vice
Azeez Hayne, Pro Hac Vice
7 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
1701 Market Street
8 Philadelphia, PA 19103
Telephone: (215) 963-5000
9 mbanks @ morganlewiscom
[email protected]
10 aha)[[email protected]
ll Attorneys for Defendants
i
12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
14 Barbara Allen, Richard Dippold, No. CV04—0424 PHX ROS
Melvin Jones, Donald McCarty,
15 Richard Scates and Walter G. West,
, individually and on behalf of all others
16 similarly situated, NOTICE OF FILING 1995 VIDEOTAPE
17 Plaintiffs,
18 l vs.
19 Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan,
1 Honeywell Secured Benefit Plan, Plan
20 Administrator of Honeywell
Retirement Earnings P an, and Plan
21 Administrator of Honeywell Secured
Benefit Plan,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25 i
26
27 i
28
Case 2:04—cv—00424—ROS Document 207 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 On June 30, 2006, Defendants filed their supplemental opposition to Plaintiffs'
2 motion for class certification and, in conjunction with that filing, requested leave to file a
3 videotape from 1995 that was referenced as an exhibit to declarations filed in support of
4 Defendants' supplemental brief. On July 7, 2006, the court granted the motion and
5 approved the filing of the videotape. It has come to counsel‘s attention that Defendants
6 inadvertently filed a videotape from the year 2000 instead of the intended 1995 videotape.
7 According, Defendants hereby file the correct videotape dated 1995, which they have
‘ 8 provided to opposing counsel.
9 Respectfully submitted this 17th day of July, 2006.
*0 osnorm MALEooN, aa.
11
12 _
13 BYi _
David B. Rosenbaum
14 Dawn L. Dauphine
Osborn Maledon, P.A.
15 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100
16 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2794
17 Michael L. Banks ( Pro Hac Vice)
William J. Delany (Pro Hoc Vice)
18 Azeez Hayne (Pm Hac Vice)
19 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
1701 Market Street
20 Philadelphia, PA 19103
21 Attorneys for Defendants
22 Copy of the foregoing mailed
23 this 17th day of July, 2006, to:
24 Susan Martin
Martin & Bonnett P.L.L.C.
25 3300 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1720
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2517
26 Attorney for Plaintiff
27 Q
28
1
Q3asp6622g046pv-00424-ROS Document 207 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00424-ROS

Document 207

Filed 07/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00424-ROS

Document 207

Filed 07/17/2006

Page 2 of 2