Free Motion to Vacate - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:04-cv-00424-ROS Document 295-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Barbara Allen, Richard Dippold, Melvin Jones, Donald McCarty, Richard Scates and Walter G. West, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan, Honeywell Secured Benefit Plan, Plan Administrator of Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan, and Plan Administrator of Honeywell Secured Benefit Plan, Defendants. THIS MATTER coming before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) The Fourth Revised Rule 16 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 291) is hereby vacated, including all deadlines set forth therein. (2) On or before June 30, 2007, the parties shall file either a notice of settlement or a joint report on the status of settlement discussions. (3) Within ten days after filing a joint report indicating that no settlement has been reached, the parties shall file a new proposed Rule 16 scheduling order, with revised dates. No. CIV 04-0424 PHX ROS ORDER VACATING RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER