Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

3 ` I A I A I I
4 T T
5 l I 1 I; . j -
6 1 T HE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT T T
7 , T FOR THE DISTRICT-OF ARIZONA . T i
8 _ T I
S Jeffrey Lutz, A __ ·. » · No. C\7,04—4S2—PHX-MS "
10 Q Plaintiifg I ORDER; T
11 vs. ` I » it i
12 I ·C·I l P li B - i I
13. i City of Phoenix, T T . T T l> _1 ‘ T T .
TT 14, Defendehg. . T T T · __·_ »T TT T `
Before e post card eent by Plaintiff, postmarlred .
T1? September 19, in post .rd, prermgrrequese to know the status·ef.~41§iri — .
T 18 case. that he no longer hes a lawyer. - ‘ ~
1 T 19 i The Court Plaintiffs poet·eerd~eea motion for statue,-and grant the T e=t* T
T T 20 motion. The Plaintiff, however,
21 k the Court must tilingthe appropriate motion er T _
22 of Court, as clone on prior oeceeionsin this case. Pleintiff must send
T. 23 E e copy of eech lor motion he files te opposing counsel., §_eeFed.
, T 24T T P. 5(a). Failure requirements eviii result in Plaintiffs
T T 25 { summarily Ii-led. . ‘ T T " _-.-- ·r
26 On Decemb@2{l—5,¥ Eledaamotlon f¤f sumrrrerYrjudQme¤t.T
T [Doc.#26, 27]. .tinl1e,‘TPieintiffrwae repreeented by counsel. Orwenuery 18, T
2005, Plaintiff, ceurleel, requested en exterteioh of time to respond. [Doc. ‘-
j ase 2:04-cv—OO482jPTC§/T Tqpocurnent 50 Filed O9/26/20i)5 Page 1 of 3 ,

¤ 1 T
1 g #29]. The Courtiir gj = request, and provided Plaintiff to February 1, 2005 to
. I - ;. ij;} .,
2 file a response. .,0n February 1, 2005, counsel for Piaintiff tiled a
3. . motion for a 60 and a motion to from the case.‘*[Doc. # 34,.35].
4 4 On February 11, the Court granted the motions. [Doc. # 36]. The Court
5 stayed the case days. and ordered Plaintiff -to tile a response tothe motion
6 l for summaryjudgmierft by.lApril 4, 2005. On April 6, 2005, Plaintiff Bled a motion to ·
7 extend the staytofthis case due to his re—incarceration. [Doc. # 38]. The Court
`8 denied the motion. andlorderw Plaintiff to respond to the summary judgment
9 , motion by May # 40]. The Order was retumed as undeliveralole. ;
10 1 [Doc. # 41]. On 6,1 2005, the Courtlissued an Order to Show Causetor
11 l Plaintiffs non—respense. [Doc. # 42]. This Order was- also retumed as
12 undeliverable. 43]. Although research was conductedoas to Plaintiffs
131. address, no to where the Gourtcould resend,
141 On July 12,ji%§§5,,some 6 months after the motion for ._
· 15 was tiled, a motion for ruling. [Doo. #44]. Oneeduly 1_3,"—2005, the
163 Court grantee-ooeeltsim-·e· motion for judgment for the reasons stated in if
17 the motion} _andf..]eid§rneht was entered. _ [Doc.,# 45, 46]. TheseOrders were f
l at 18, returned as after researchiwas conducted as to Plaintiffs address.
· 19 [Doc. #47, 48]. _ ‘ . . e . _ i r _ _
20 l The an order addressing the merits of ;Plaitttiff*s case. ` I
21r Plaintiffs case dismissed. The--Court provided] Plaintiff multiple -
. 22} extensions and o§§éttinities..to··respond to-the Plaintiff failed to file a notice
23. of change of woulcthave provided himjnecessary information from the. _
241 Court and the to respondtto Defendants To the
251 I extent to know the status ofhis 2005 request .
27 ‘ Although the Court did notehterjucigment because of Plaintiffs non- #
26 response to the l . i - . _
j Case 2:04-cv-00482-ECY Document 50 B Filed 09/26/2005 Page 2 of 3 ,

r 1 E for an extender;l;isto§ii; this case, Plaintiffs request is untimely made; The Court
_ ZE denied the motion extension of time approximately 5 months ago, At this · I
3. juncture, if PIaintit‘f.seeks·to. pursue his case, Plaintiff must seekreconsideration of
L. E the Court's judgmettt. Reoonsideration is warranted to consider nevvly discovered
5, evidence or an- change in controlling law, as well as to correct clear 1
6 BFPO?. tu n e. T t t. rua; •._. t4 * .2 ¤. ,5F.3d 12.55,1263
7. (9th Cir. 1993), 512 U.S. 1238 (1994}.. ln. addition, ajudgment may be
-. 8 vacated upon a;·.sliowingl—of "(1.) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or exouselole
9. neglect" or“(6) .}ustifyino relief} Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(b). Plaintiff. _ ·
_ 1.0* must show *‘ex@ot§oiriai·y circumstanoes" toobtain relief under Rule 80(b)(6). .
11 I Multgomah at 1263. Accordingly,
12` lT IS that: ` l - ‘
· 13 ! 1. The-postcard reoeivedbyCherni:1ers.postmarked
'|4i Sheé ttgtiglocketed asa motion for status.- . P “ `4 . l L iW`
15, 2. for status is to thoextent contained herein.
. 16 3. Theg3C§§rlt.shall send a copy of‘thia.eQrder to Plaintiff atthe address on `
17 the { . P .
181 4. Pielntifilshell apreper notice of change of eddresewith the Court
. 19 wlthiit.—”£8;;1e;rjs_.of,£ite·.dele; ofntlae ofthis Order., _ ‘
20 owen day sr zooe. , it 1
1 zi P ..... Q 1 . ` `
zsh r o
24 r ‘·$`iiit.;i;. , » r —..t . _ P , . ,.
26 i . 1 U.-use s lliagilitls .»...ggsf P ,
27 fQ . 1 3 i 3 3 P
. case 2:04-cv-004_sai`§§iil{ an Pocurnentsor Fiisd’~0eZge{2o.o5 Page e_&>ie ‘ , '

Case 2:04-cv-00482-ECV

Document 50

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00482-ECV

Document 50

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00482-ECV

Document 50

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 3 of 3