Free Objection - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 Jay A. Zweig (011153) Jeffrey B. Kuykendal (021878) 2 GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. 2575 E. Camelback Road 3 Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225 (602) 530-8407 4 Attorneys for Defendants 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8 Constance Ann Maynard, an individual,
! " # $ % &' ) * # &" # # #

9 10 vs.

Plaintiff,

NO. CV 04-0525-PHX-RCB DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S ADDITIONAL STATEMENT OF FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN PLAINTIFF'S CONTROVERTING STATEMENT OF FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 CNA Group Life Assurance Company, an Illinois Corporation; Continental Casualty 12 Company, an Illinois Corporation; Hewitt Associates, L.L.C., an Illinois Limited 13 Liability Company; and Hewitt Long Term Disability Plan, 14 15 16 17 Defendants.

(% #

Defendants CNA Group Life Assurance Company and Continental Casualty

18 Company (collectively "CNA") and Defendants Hewitt Associates, L.L.C. and Hewitt 19 Long Term Disability Plan (collectively "Hewitt") respond and object to Plaintiff's 20 Additional Statement of Facts contained within Plaintiff's Controverting Statement of 21 Facts in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' filed 22 a Motion to Strike those paragraphs of Plaintiff's Controverting Statement of Facts
Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB Document 93 Filed 10/11/2005 Page 1 of 3

1 that relied upon documents or information outside the administrative record and those 2 arguments are expressly incorporated herein. Further Defendants dispute and object 3 to two additional paragraphs contained within Plaintiff's Controverting Statement of 4 Facts as "Additional Statement of Facts." 5 Defendants dispute and object to Paragraph 51 in that it states a legal conclusion,

6 is not based upon any evidence in the record, and is not supported by the evidence in 7 the record. 8 Defendants dispute and object to Paragraph 52 in that it states a legal

9 conclusion, is not based upon any evidence in the record, and is not supported by the 10 evidence in the record. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
th 18 Electronically filed this 11 day of October, 2005, with electronic copies to: 19 David F. Gomez, Esq. Michael J. Petitti, Jr., Esq. 20 GOMEZ & PETITTI, P.C. 21 2525 E. Camelback, Suite 860 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 22 Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB Document 93 -2Filed 10/11/2005

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 11th day of October, 2005. GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A.

By/s/ Jeffrey B. Kuykendal Jay A. Zweig Jeffrey B. Kuykendal 2575 E. Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225 Attorneys for Defendants

Page 2 of 3

th 1 COPY of the foregoing mailed this 11 day of October, 2005, to: 2 Stuart H. Sandhaus, Esq. 3 STUART H. SANDHAUS, A.P.C. Los Rios Historic District 4 31901 Los Rios Street San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 5 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB Document 93 -3Filed 10/11/2005 Page 3 of 3
1303226/130-2669

/s/ Jan Vigorito