Free Stipulation - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 144.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 632 Words, 3,731 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 790.92 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43431/88.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Arizona ( 144.0 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Arizona
l Stuart H. Sandhaus (California Bar #146525)
2 [email protected]
STUART H. SANDHAUS, P.C.
3 Los Rios Historic District
4 3 I 901 Los Rios Street
San Jun Capistrano, CA 92675
5 (949) 481-0236
6 David F. Gomez (006790) g
7 [email protected] Q
8 Michael J. Petitti, Jr. (011667)
GOMEZ & PETITTI, P.C.
9 2525 East Camelback Road, Suite 860
10 Phoenix, Arizona 85016
E (602) 957-8686
E 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
0 "i E
12 Jay A. Zvveig (0lll33)
E 8 8§ 13 Jeffrey B. Kuykendal (021878) _
E @$2 14 [email protected] _
gg §§ GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, EA.
U EE 15 2575 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100 Q
R 16 Phoenix, AZ 85016-9225 Q
E Attorneys for Defendants Q
17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g
18 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
19 CONSTANCE ANN MAYNARD, an individual,
20 Case No. CIV 04-525-PHX-RCB
Plaintiff
21 v.
22 STIPULATION
CNA GROUP LIFE ASSURANCE COl\/IPANY,
23 an Illinois Corporation; CONTINENTAL
24 CASUALTY COl\/[PANY; an Illinois
Corporation; HEWITT ASSOCIATES LLC, an
25 Illinois Limited Liability Company; and HEWITT
26 LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,
27 Defendants. .
28
1
Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB Document 88 Filed O9/O7/2005 Page 1 of 3

1 The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the Court may vacate the presently-
2 scheduled September 26, 2005 pretrial conference in view of the pending Motion for
3 Summary Judgment, which has not yet been fully briefed. The parties also stipulate and I
4 agree that the pretrial conference should be rescheduled 45 days after the Court rules on
5 the pending dispositive mtion, or at such date as the Court finds convenient.
6 The parties acknowledge that pursuant to the Court’s Order filed May 3, 2005,
7 the parties have 30 days following the ruling on the present pending motion to file a I
8 pretrial order. The content of the proposed pretrial order shall include, but not be
9 limited to, that prescribed in a standard form of pretrial order which was given counsel
O 10 at the scheduling conference. t
E 11 Respectfully submitted this 7Zé day of #4餤/*,2005.
siié J
Eg jg 12 STUART H. SANDHAUS, P.C. ‘
E é 13 Stuart H. Sandhaus, Esq.
is Q $3 g 14 [email protected] I
§§ E2 Los Rios Historic District
O ig E 15 31901 Los Rios Street
Q 16 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
17 GOMEZ & PETITTI, P.C.
18
19 By: s/ David F. Gomez, Esg. 2
20 David F. Gomez, Esq.
[email protected]
21 Michael J. Petitti, Jr., Esq.
22 2525 E. Camelback Road, Suite 860
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
23 On behalf of Attorneys for Plaintiff
24
25 t
26
27
28
2
Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB Document 88 Filed O9/O7/2005 Page 2 of 3

1 GALLAGBTER 8:. KENNEDY, P.A.
2 /7 1
3 By: ¢ Q
4 a . sig, rrq.
J B. Ku aendal, Esq. I j
5 jb1<@gknet.oo1n _
6 2575 E. Camelback Road, Suite 11 0
Phoenix, AZ S5004·—23B2 ` {
7 Attorneys for Defendants i
8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE =
9 ; Q
10 I hereby certify that on the Tczlrl dey of September, 2005, I eleottoui all E
5 ttansmitxed the attached document te the Clerids oftice using the CM/ECF System f t
E 11 tiling and transmittal of a Notice of Elecmunic Filing to the following CMI C
eg =¤_`§ registrant: I
·= tea 12
Eg 13 Iefhey B. Iiuykencial _
Z é 14 jbk@gl·;r1et.c0¤1 I
g jg e 15 1
5* 16 sf Bernice J'. Pendell
17 f 2
IS =
19 1
20 Q
21 ;
22 I
23 I
24 . 1
25 ; I _
26
27 ‘
2S
. 3
Ce 2.04—cv—OO525-RCB Document 88 Filed O9/O7/2005 Page 3 of 3 .

Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB

Document 88

Filed 09/07/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB

Document 88

Filed 09/07/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00525-RCB

Document 88

Filed 09/07/2005

Page 3 of 3