1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. Wayne Charles Bryan, Defendants. Upon motion of the Defendant, Government having no objection and good cause United States of America CR-00-0185-001-PHX-JAT Plaintiff, ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
11 appearing, to wit: additional time needed to resolve defendant's two cases (CR 08-234-PHX12 JAT and CR 00-185-PHX-JAT) as the outcome of the newer case will impact defendant's 13 decision on how to proceed in the supervised release case, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting [89] Defendant's Motion to Continue 15 Dispositional Hearing (Admit/Deny Hearing re: Supervised Release). This court specifically 16 finds that the ends of justice served by taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public 17 and the defendant in a speedy disposition. This finding is based on the court's conclusion that 18 the failure to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny the attorney for defendant the 19 reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 20 diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii) & (iv). 21 IT IS ORDERED continuing Admit/Deny Hearing re: Petition to Revoke Supervised 22 Release from May 6, 2008 to Tuesday, July 8, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in Phoenix, Arizona. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. § 24 3161(h) will commence on 4/8/2008, for a total of 25 DATED this 11th day of April, 2008. 26 27 28 3 days.
Case 2:00-cr-00185-JAT
Document 90
Filed 04/11/2008
Page 1 of 1