Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 475-6 Filed O2/16/2007 Page1 of 3

Case 1 :04-cv-00343-JJF Document 475-6 Filed O2/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
’ CON NOLLY BOVE LODGE 8a HUTZ LLP
ir Arronmavs AT 1.Aw
1.os Auczuas, CA X
A 355 S. Grand Ave.
Suite 3150
. Los A les, CA 90071
g=;;>¤R-M·*·~ F5;.
a ner mx; (2121 687 0498
TEL (213) 787_25·]g WEB: WWW.Cblh.C0lTl
emmr [email protected]
Via Email and US. Mail
February 8, 2007 I
Cass W. Christenson, Esq.
McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP
1900 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1108
Re: LG.Pl1ilq1s LCD C0., Ltd. v. ViewSonic Corporation, et al. -
USDC Case N0. 04-343 JJF
_ Dear Cass:
This letter supplements my letter to you of yesterday and responds to your email of
today regarding the additional discovery supplementation that ViewSonic demands from
LPL, which is warranted by the exposure of LPL’s extended misrepresentation regarding
its commercialization of products that practice the supposed invention of the patents in suit. .
As detailed in my letter of yesterday, LPL’s false assertion that it did not make
products that practice any of the supposed inventions of the patents in suit has greatly
prejudiced ViewSonic in its discovery activities. In addition to the matters raised in that
letter, we demand that LPL immediately fully respond to ViewSonic’s Requests for
Production nos. 12, 13, 15, 28, 29, 33 and 67-70. Given the enormous delay already
occasioned by LPL’s tactics, we demand that LPL immediately produce all ofthe
` responsive documents, and that it produce all samples for inspection in Los Angeles not
later than Monday, February 12. Failing that, it is clear that the depositions ofthe LPL
witnesses that are presently noticed for February 22 cannot be completed and we reserve
_ the right to reconvene and complete those depositions once LPL provides this long overdue
discovery.
10697.1 A
wxrnvuucrow, ma WASHINGTON, nc ros Anczrrs, CA

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 475-6 Filed O2/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
V LLY Bova i.o¤c1.=; at HUTZ LLP
%
Cass W. Christenson, Esq.
February 8, 2007
Page 2
Absent the immediate acceptable resolution of this matter, we intend to bring this
ltuther example of LPL°s continued failure to participate in discovery to the Special
Master’s attention at the earliest possible time.
Sin ere py,
JV
0 - I
. til' .
yr l- . M1lle1‘
cc: Rel S. Ambrozy, Esq.
Lora A. Brzezynski, Esq.
Cormac T. Connor, Esq.
Richard D. Kirk, Esq.
Mark H. Krietzman, Esq.
Valerie W. Ho, Esq.
Steve P. Hassid, Esq. .
Anne Shea Gaza, Esq.
Frederick L. Cottrell lll, Esq.
Tracy R. Roman, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Bove, Esq.
Jaclyn M. Mason, Esq.
Manuel C. Nelson, Esq.
James D. Heisman, Esq.
10697.1

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 475-6

Filed 02/16/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 475-6

Filed 02/16/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 475-6

Filed 02/16/2007

Page 3 of 3