Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 475-4 Filed O2/16/2007 Page1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 475-4 Filed O2/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
AU McKenna Long
DTIKB & 1 SETI DiEQD
Denver Ammcw alluw gem) San Francisco
Los Angeles 1900 K Street, NW • Washington, DC 20006 Washington, DC
_ _ 202.4%.7500 • Fax; 202.4%.7756
Philadelphia \N'WW.I"l'ICk€HHBl0ng.COm Brussels
DEREK A. AUITO Ervmit ADDRESS
(202) 496-71 G2 [email protected]
.January 9, 2007
Via E-Mari. AND U.S. Mini.
Scott R. Miller, Esq.
Connolly Bove Lodge & I-Iutz, LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3150
Los Angeles, CA 9007]
Re: LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. v. Tatung. et al.; Civil Action No. 04-343 (JJF)
Dear Scott:
Pursuant to the Special l\/laster‘s guidance in the December 28 teleconference relating to
ViewSonic's Document Requests Nos. 7]-74 and l 18, counsel tbr LPI. has further investigated
the products that LPL sells. We have coniirmed that LPL does not sell modules for computer
monitors that could be used for rearmounting as claimed in the Patents—in—Suit. We have also
determined that LPL sells LCD modules for televisions that have a different structure.
Specifically, LPI. recently has been selling LCD modules for televisions that could be used by
third party assemblers in a way that practices LPL‘s rearmounting technology claimed in the
Patents-in-Suit, depending on the construction ofthe claims and how third parties assemble
finished products that incorporate LPL’s modules. LPI. will promptly Search for and produce
any responsive discovery. We anticipate that LPL will produce any such additional discovery on
a rolling basis to be completed by January 31, 2007.
Very t i yours,
erek A. Auito
DA/\:ae
i>t*s<14mui.1
Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF
Document 475-4
Filed 02/16/2007
Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF
Document 475-4
Filed 02/16/2007
Page 2 of 2