Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-00343-JJF Document 549 Filed O3/O7/2007 Page 1 of 2
RECHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER
A F’F'2OFE55lONAL AS5CJCiA’¥'iON
Om; Roowev Saunas
920 Nonrw Kano Srmzszr
ANNE 5HEA GMA WILMHQGTON, DELAWARE IBEBOI Dnnecr Dm.
cena) ses 1-7700 *°g‘i;s(§§L'Ff :;*:19
mx rzaoai esa-vvon
WWW..FlL F" COM
March 7, 2007
BY E-l\/IAIL & HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Vincent J. Poppiti
BLANK ROME LLP
Chase Manhattan Center
1201 Market Street, Suite 800
Wilmington, DE 19801
Rc: LG.PhiIips LCD Co., Ltd v. ViewSonic Corp., er nl., CA. No. 04-343-.].IF
Dear Special Master Poppiti:
This letter is ajoint submission from the parties containing their proposed agendas for the
in—person hearing before Your Honor scheduled for l\/larch 9, 2007.
I. Defendants propose the following agenda:
1. LPL’s Motion for Protective Order Concerning Mr. Bangs Deposition
2. LPL's Motion for Protective Order Concerning Mr, Kinrs Deposition
3. Any other issues regarding ongoing depositions and production
4. Review of CAD/CAM tiles (Tatung Defendants request in camera review)
5. Unresolved issues concerning discovery from Tatung Defendants as discussed during the
March 2 teleconference
6. Sufticiency ofTatung matrix of related products and LPL's request for
product categorizations / sample
7. Sufliciency of Tatung assembly drawings, work instructions and photographs for
infringement purposes
8. Viewsonids Motion for Protective Order To Circninscribe the Scope of Topics for Which
ViewSonic Must Produce a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) Witness.
nrt 1-2 i2¤l0¢l9-I

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 549 Filed O3/O7/2007 Page 2 of 2
The Hoiiorable Vincent J. Poppiti
March 7, 2007
Page 2
II. Plaintiffs Propose the following agenda:
As Plaintiff discussed with opposing counsel, the attorneys arguing i`atung’s Agenda
Itern Nos. l and 2 are also arguing Tatung item No, 5, Plaintiffs fail to see any reason why those
attorneys need to sit through the review of the CAD/CAM files (Tatung's Item No. 4), before
arguing Tatung item No. 5. Additionally, Plaintiff asked Tatung to explain what issues it sought
to include in its catcl1—all Item No, 3, but received no response. Because it is now impossible to
prepare for any additional arguments, Plaintiff does not agree to `l'atung's item No. 3. Finally, as
discussed with "fatung today, Plaintiff would like to raise with the Special Master during the
hearing on March Sth, Plaintiffs limited participation in the review of the CAD/CAM drawings
as they pertain to the documents already produced by Tatung.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs propose the following topics for the March 9tli I-Iearing:
l, I,PL’s Motion for Protective Order Concerning Mr, Bangs Deposition
2, LPL’s Motion for Protective Order Concerning Mr, K.im’s Deposition
3, Unresolved issues concerning discovery from Tatung Defendants as discussed during
the March 2 teleconference
4. Review of CAD/CAM files (Plaintiff seeks to be present for at least the review of the
Tatung documents already produced)
5. Insufficiency of Tatung matrix of related products and LPL's request for
product categorizations and samples
6, Insufficiency of Tatung assembly drawings, work instructions and photographs for
infringement purposes,
Respectliilly,
W ltd UZ/rl it »»—~—-——·-
ii li!
nne Shea Gaza
(#4093)
cc: Clerk of Court (via CM/ECP)
Richard Kirk, Esquire (via electronic mail)
Cormac I`, Connor, Esquire (via electronic mail)
Mark Krietznian, Esquire (via electronic mail)
Scott R, Miller, Esquire (via electronic mail)
Jeffrey B. Bove, Esquire (via electronic mail)
arr is rzqarv-1

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 549

Filed 03/07/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 549

Filed 03/07/2007

Page 2 of 2