Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 153.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 7, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 507 Words, 3,062 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7695/545-7.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 153.1 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF Document 545-7 Filed O3/07/2007 Page1 of 3

Case 1 :O4—cv-00343-JJF Document 545-7 Filed O3/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
} CON N OLLY BOVE LODGE 8c H UTZ LLP Wells F¤r¤¤ Center
’ ——————··——·—-——-———-— South Tower, Suite 3150
{/ * A ATTORNEYS AT LAW 355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles CA 90071
rei. (213) 787 2500 ‘ ‘
FAX (213) 687 0498
Scott R. Miller
P¤FY¤¤t‘ The Nemours Building
1007 North Orange Street
rz:. (213) 787-2510 . . PQ BOX 2207
FAX (213) 687-0498 Wilmington, DE 19899
enum. [email protected] TEL (302) 658 9141
nentv ru Los Angeles Oftice FAX (302) 658 5614
1990 I\/l Street, NW, Suite 800
Via Email and F irsi Class Mail wasmngztm oc zcms
rei. (202) 331 7111
FAX (202) 293 6229
January 29, 2007
was www.cbIh.com
Cass W. Christenson, Esq.
McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP
1900 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Re: LG.Philzps LCD C0., Ltd v. ViewSonic Corp., ei al.
USDC, Delaware, C.A. No. 04-343-JJF
Dear Cass:
On January 24, 2007, your firm served a Supplemental Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) of
ViewSonic Corporation ("Notice"). We request that you withdraw that notice immediately.
First, the Notice attempts to set the deposition date for January 30, 2007. Pursuant to
D. Del. LR 30.1, a reasonable notice cannot be less than five days. In conformance with Rule
6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we understand D. Del. LR 30.1 to mean five
business or court days. Inasmuch the Notice provided only four days notice, it is defective.
“ Second, as you already know, ViewSonic, in the ordinary course of its business, does not
categorize, classify, or concern itself with "the type and/or classification of mounting technology
or mounting system employed or mounting system used" in any of its Visual Display Products
(as that term is defined in the Notice). Consequently, ViewSonic cannot designate or produce a
witness to testify about the topic identified in the Notice, and the Notice should be withdrawn.
ln any event, ViewSonic’s Motion for a Protective Order remains pending, and
encompasses the Notice served last week. If LPL is of a different opinion, please advise by 4 pm
PST today.
Si • re y,
‘ t
lil
" . `ller

Case 1 :04-cv-00343-JJF Document 545-7 Filed O3/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
W i ,... l... .... ,.,,. .,,., a.,.
A ATTORNEYS AT LAW .
Cass W. Christenson, Esq. ~
January 29, 2007
Page 2
cc: Rel S. Ambrozy, Esq.
Lora A. Brzezynski, Esq.
Cormac T. Connor, Esq.
Richard D. Kirk, Esq.
Mark H. Krietzman, Esq.
Frank E. Merideth, Jr., Esq.
Valerie W. Ho, Esq.
Steve P. Hassid, Esq.
Anne Shea Gaza, Esq.
Frederick L. Cottrell III, Esq.
Tracy R. Roman, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Bove, Esq.
Jaclyn M. Mason, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 545-7

Filed 03/07/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 545-7

Filed 03/07/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00343-JJF

Document 545-7

Filed 03/07/2007

Page 3 of 3