Free Order on Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv—OO415—SLR Document 53 Filed O9/15/2005 Page1 of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ERIC A. CHAMBERS, )
Plaintiff, ) Q
v. ) Civ. No. 04-415-SLR Y
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ) l
JOHN Dos #3, Joan Dos #4, ) ;
JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #6, }
JOHN DOE #7, DONALD J. sowMAN,)
JR., CITY OF WILMINGTON )
DELAWARE, DELAWARE S.P.C.A., )
SGT. ELLIOTT, )
Defendants. g
O R D E R
At Wilmington this\5*`day of September, 2005, having
reviewed the record at bar, and having determined that neither
plaintiff nor defendants have responded adequately to previous
orders of this court;
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motions to dismiss and for summary
judgment are denied without prejudice to renew. (D.I. 18, 29)
Defendants shall file an answer to plaintiff's complaint on or
before October 17, 2005.
2. On or before October 17, 2005, plaintiff shall
submit a total of ten (10) interrogatories including sub-parts to
City defendants. On or before October 17, 2005, plaintiff shall

Case 1:04-cv—OO415—SLR Document 53 Filed O9/15/2005 Page 2 of 2
submit a total of ten (10) interrogatories including sub—parts to
S.P.C.A. defendants. Defendants shall respond to said
interrogatories on or before November 17, 2005. All discovery
shall be closed on December 19, 2005. NOTE: If plaintiff fails
to timely file the requested interrogatories, the record shall be l
deemed closed.
3. Dispositive motions are due on or before January
19, 2006. Answering briefs and affidavits, if any, shall be
filed on or before February 21, 2006. Reply briefs shall be %
filed on or before March 7, 2006. Q
3. Plaintiff's motion to amend or correct is denied H
without prejudice to renew after the close of discovery. (D.I. ?
46)
4. Plaintiff's motion to compel and for default
judgment is denied. (D.I. 50)
5. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel
is denied (D.I. 34), the court finding no evidence that
appointment of counsel is warranted at this time. Tabron v.
Qragg, 6 F.3d 147, 155 (Bd Cir. 1993); Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294
F.3d 492, 499 (3d Cir. 2002).
2

Case 1:04-cv-00415-SLR

Document 53

Filed 09/15/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00415-SLR

Document 53

Filed 09/15/2005

Page 2 of 2