Case 1:04—cv—00593-GI\/IS Document 53-8 Filed 08/15/2005 Page1 0f2
Case 1 :04—cv—00593-GI\/IS Document 53-8 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 2 of 2 2
TAB 7 ‘
DEFENDANT’S EXPERT WITNESSES
Jason F. Fensterstock (Sasco Hill Advisers)
Objection - the witness, identified on the
_ issue of insolvency, has no opinions to offer y
Rlchafd A- Whalen (Duff & Phelps, LLC) that are different or additional to those of
Jason Fensterstock, designated as an expert
on the same issue (F.R.E. 403). See Motion
in Limine.
Objection — the witness is not qualified to
_ provide expert testimony on any issue of
Steven Gedeey (Tngrnm Entertainment) consequencegm the determination or this §
action (F.R.E. 702). See Motion in Limine. 3
Objection — the witness, an expert witness
disclosed in the Dell action, is not qualified y
J0h¤ LeReeee to provide expert testimony on any issue of
consequence to the determination of this
action (F .R.E. 702), and was never identified j
by Defendant as a potential witness in :
disclosures or discovery or designated by
Defendant as an expert witness. (Fed. R. `
Civ. P. 26 & 33. ) See Motion in Lil'l1il1E.
Any expert designated by Plaintiff or other ‘
defendant in a consolidated trial _;
4212s-coait>ocs_1.A;142a3s.s
Case 1:04-cv-00593-GMS
Document 53-8
Filed 08/15/2005
Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00593-GMS
Document 53-8
Filed 08/15/2005
Page 2 of 2