Case 1:04—cv—00593-GI\/IS Document 53-7 Filed 08/15/2005 Page1 0f2 r
Case 1 :04—cv—00593-Gl\/IS Document 53-7 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 2 of 2
TAB 6 - PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WITNESSES
Dean Vomero Objection to this witness’s opinion and report
offered in rebuttal to Defendant’s expert
report on the solvency issue because the t
rebuttal opinion and report are based on â€
documents and other evidence not
previously disclosed by Plaintiff in
discovery. See Defendant’s Motion in
Limine to Exclude Previously Undisclosed
Evidence filed concurrently with Pretrial
Order. (See Motion in Lirnine) -
Stua.rt A. Gollin Unqualified by knowledge, skill, experience,
training, or education; the proffered opinions
are not based on sufficient facts or data,
reliable principles and methods, and the
principles and methods have not been
reliably applied to the facts of the case. Fed.
R. Evid. 702.
The probative value of the testimony would
also be substantially outweighed by unfair
prejudice and confusion of the issues. Fed.
. R. Evid. 403. l
See Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude
Expert Testimony (Dcmbert Motion) filed »
concurrently with Pretrial Order.
cxtc 1* by D cfcndan t
42125-0O3\DOCS_LA:l42335.9
Case 1:04-cv-00593-GMS
Document 53-7
Filed 08/15/2005
Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00593-GMS
Document 53-7
Filed 08/15/2005
Page 2 of 2