Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 1 of 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

MICHAEL O'TOOLE (SBN 97779) City Attorney RANDOLPH S. HOM (SBN 152833) Assistant City Attorney CITY OF HAYWARD 777 "B" Street Hayward, California 94541 Telephone: (510) 583-4450 Facsimile: (510) 583-3660 Attorneys for Defendants City of Hayward, Lloyd Lowe, and Jason Corsolini UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Defendants 17 / 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Defendants City of Hayward, Lloyd Lowe, and Jason Corsolini respond to plaintiff's complaint for damages, as follows: 1. Defendants admit that plaintiff purports to invoke jurisdiction of this court -vsCITY OF HAYWARD, a municipal corporation; LLOYD LOWE, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF HAYWARD, JASON CORSOLINI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the CITY OF HAYWARD, and DOES 1-25, inclusive, SALEH ALI, individually, and as Adminstrator of the Estate of NASIR SOLIS Plaintiff, Case No:. C 07 -04718 (EMC) DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code Section 1331 and 1343, and the court's pendent jurisdiction over claims arising under state law otherwise defendants deny generally and specifically each and every remaining allegations of paragraph 1 of plaintiff's complaint. 2. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 2 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

1

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 2 of 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

3.

Defendants admit that the City of Hayward is a municipal corporation, otherwise

defendants deny generally and specifically each and every remaining allegation of paragraph 3 of plaintiff's complaint. 4. Defendants admit and that Lloyd Lowe is/was Chief of Police for the City of

Hayward, otherwise defendants deny generally and specifically each and every remaining allegation of paragraph 4 of plaintiff's complaint. 5. Defendants admit that Jason Corsolini is/was a Hayward Police Department

officer, otherwise defendants deny generally and specifically each and every remaining allegation of paragraph 5 of plaintiff's complaint. 6. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 6 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 7 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 8. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 8 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 9. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 9 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 10 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 11. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 11 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

2

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 3 of 12

1 2 3 4

12.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

allegations contained in paragraph 12 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 13. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

5 allegations contained in paragraph 13 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 6 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7 14. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

8 allegations contained in paragraph 14 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 9 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10 15. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

11 allegations contained in paragraph 15 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 12 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 13 16. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

14 allegations contained in paragraph 16 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 15 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 16 17. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

17 allegations contained in paragraph 17 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 18 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 19 18. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

20 allegations contained in paragraph 18 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 21 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 22 19. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

23 allegations contained in paragraph 19 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 24 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 25 20. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

26 allegations contained in paragraph 20 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 27 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

3

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 4 of 12

1

21.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

2 allegations contained in paragraph 21 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 3 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 4 22. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

5 allegations contained in paragraph 22 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 6 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7 23. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

8 allegations contained in paragraph 23 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 9 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10 24. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

11 allegations contained in paragraph 24 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 12 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 13 25. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

14 allegations contained in paragraph 25 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 15 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 16 26. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

17 allegations contained in paragraph 26 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 18 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 19 27. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

20 allegations contained in paragraph 27 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 21 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 22 28. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

23 allegations contained in paragraph 28 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 24 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 25 29. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

26 allegations contained in paragraph 29 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 27 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

4

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 5 of 12

1

30.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

2 allegations contained in paragraph 30 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 3 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 4 31. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

5 allegations contained in paragraph 31 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 6 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7 32. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

8 allegations contained in paragraph 32 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 9 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10 33. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

11 allegations contained in paragraph 33 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 12 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 13 34. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

14 allegations contained in paragraph 34 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 15 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 16 35. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

17 allegations contained in paragraph 35 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 18 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 19 36. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

20 allegations contained in paragraph 36 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 21 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 22 37. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

23 allegations contained in paragraph 37 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 24 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 25 38. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

26 allegations contained in paragraph 38 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 27 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

5

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 6 of 12

1

39.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

2 allegations contained in paragraph 39 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 3 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 4 40. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

5 allegations contained in paragraph 40 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 6 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7 41. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

8 allegations contained in paragraph 41 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 9 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10 42. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

11 allegations contained in paragraph 42 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 12 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 13 43. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

14 allegations contained in paragraph 43 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 15 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 16 44. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

17 allegations contained in paragraph 44 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 18 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 19 45. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

20 allegations contained in paragraph 45 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 21 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 22 46. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

23 allegations contained in paragraph 46 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 24 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 25 47. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

26 allegations contained in paragraph 47 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 27 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

6

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 7 of 12

1

48.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

2 allegations contained in paragraph 48 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 3 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 4 49. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

5 allegations contained in paragraph 49 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 6 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7 50. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

8 allegations contained in paragraph 50 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 9 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10 51. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

11 allegations contained in paragraph 51 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 12 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 13 52. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

14 allegations contained in paragraph 52 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 15 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 16 53. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

17 allegations contained in paragraph 53 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 18 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 19 54. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

20 allegations contained in paragraph 54 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 21 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 22 55. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

23 allegations contained in paragraph 55 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 24 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 25 56. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

26 allegations contained in paragraph 56 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 27 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

7

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 8 of 12

1

57.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

2 allegations contained in paragraph 57 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 3 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 4 58. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

5 allegations contained in paragraph 58 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 6 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 7 59. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

8 allegations contained in paragraph 59 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 9 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 10 60. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

11 allegations contained in paragraph 60 of plaintiff's complaint, and, on that basis, deny generally 12 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph 13 61. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

14 allegations contained in paragraph 61 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 15 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 16 62. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

17 allegations contained in paragraph 62 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 18 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 19 63. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

20 allegations contained in paragraph 63 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 21 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 22 64. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

23 allegations contained in paragraph 64 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 24 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 25 65. Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

26 allegations contained in paragraph 65 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 27 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

8

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 9 of 12

1

66.

Defendants have insufficient information and knowledge to respond to the

2 allegations contained in paragraph 66 of plaintiff's complaint and, on that basis, deny generally 3 and specifically each and every allegation contained in said paragraph. 4 5 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AS A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's complaint,

6 defendants allege that they are immune from liability for the acts and omissions alleged in 7 plaintiff's complaint by virtue of the provisions of Sections 815, 815.2, 815.6, 818, 818.8, 820.2, 8 820.4, 820.8, 821.6, 822.2, 844.6 and 845.6 of the California Government Code. 9 AS A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

10 complaint, defendants allege that neither plaintiff's complaint nor any of its alleged causes of 11 action state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against defendants. 12 AS A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's complaint,

13 defendants allege that plaintiff did not use the heightened pleading standards as required by City 14 of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989) and its progeny, and have thus failed to state a cause of 15 action against defendant police officers in their individual capacities. 16 AS A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

17 complaint, defendants allege that they are immune from liability for the arrest, detention and 18 restraint of plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 19 5154, Government Code Section 856, and Penal Code Sections 835, 835a, 836, and 847, in that 20 the officers had reasonable suspicion/probable cause to believe that plaintiff had committed a 21 public offense/was a danger to others, or to himself, or gravely disabled, and that any and all force 22 used in effecting his arrest, detention and restraint, was lawful, reasonable, and necessary, under 23 the circumstances at the time of the incident. 24 AS A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's complaint ,

25 defendants allege that at the time and place mentioned in plaintiff's complaint, defendants' use of 26 force, if any there was, was necessary for defendants' self defense, defense of others, and to effect 27 the lawful detention/arrest of plaintiff.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

9

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 10 of 12

1

AS A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's complaint ,

2 defendants allege that they are entitled to qualified and official immunity. Defendants acted at all 3 times in good faith, with due care, within the scope of discretion, and pursuant to laws, 4 regulations, rules, and practices reasonably believed to be in accordance with the Constitution and 5 laws of the United States. There is no liability pursuant to the Federal Civil Rights Act where one 6 acts in good faith and entertains an honest, reasonable belief that one's actions are in accord with 7 clearly established law.[Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982) ; Saucier v. Katz, 533 8 U.S. 194 (2001); Smith v. Hemet, 394 F.3d 689 (9th Cir. 2005).] 9 AS A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

10 complaint, defendants allege that plaintiff was comparatively at fault in the manner and style as 11 set forth in Li v. Yellow Cab Company , 13 Cal.3d 804 (1975), and defendants pray that any and 12 all damages sustained by plaintiff be reduced by the percentage of his own negligence in the 13 happenings herein. 14 AS AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

15 complaint, defendants allege that the damages sustained by plaintiff, if any, were proximately 16 caused, in whole or in part by others for whom these answering defendants are neither liable or 17 responsible. Should defendants be found to be liable to plaintiff, which liability is expressly 18 denied, said defendants are entitled to have any award against them abated, reduced, or eliminated 19 to the extent that the negligence, carelessness, or fault of any of said other persons or entities 20 contributed to plaintiff's damages, if any there were. 21 AS A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's complaint,

22 defendants allege that plaintiff's complaint exceeds the scope of the claim presented to defendant 23 City of Hayward pursuant to California Government Code §§910 and 911.2. 24 AS A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

25 complaint, defendants allege that plaintiffs' complaint fails to state a cause of action against these 26 defendants under the holding in Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York 27 436 U.S. 658 (1978), and its progeny.

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

10

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 11 of 12

1

AS AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

2 complaint, defendants allege that the outcome of the incidents alleged in plaintiff's complaint 3 would have been the same regardless of any additional or different training which might have 4 been provided to the officers involved. 5 AS A TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

6 complaint, defendants allege that at all relevant times, defendants acted independently and not in 7 association or concert with any agent or servant of any other defendant, including defendants sued 8 herein under the fictitious names of their employer, employees or agents. 9 AS A THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

10 complaint, defendants allege that plaintiff has failed to mitigate her damages. 11 AS A FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

12 complaint, defendants allege that plaintiff willingly, voluntarily, and knowingly assumed each, 13 every, and all of the risks and hazards involved in the activities alleged in the complaint. 14 AS A FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

15 complaint, defendants allege that plaintiff's and Solis' own conduct estops plaintiff from claiming 16 the damages alleged in plaintiff's complaint. 17 AS A SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

18 complaint, defendants allege that defendants are entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs of 19 suit upon prevailing within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1988, California Code of Civil Procedure 20 §1038, and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 AS A SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

22 complaint, defendants allege that plaintiff's complaint, in its entirety, is barred by the applicable 23 statute of limitations. 24 AS AN EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

25 omplaint, defendants allege that defendant City of Hayward and all defendants sued in their 26 official capacity are immune from the imposition of punitive damages. 27 AS A NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to each cause of action of plaintiff's

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

11

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 3

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 12 of 12

1 complaint defendants allege that because plaintiff's complaint is written in legal conclusory terms, 2 all affirmative defenses available to defendants cannot be fully anticipated of ascertained at this 3 time. Accordingly, defendants reserve the right to assert additional affirmative defenses available 4 to defendants that cannot be fully anticipated or ascertained at this time. Accordingly, defendants 5 reserve the right to assert additional affirmative defenses, if and when the extent that such 6 affirmative defenses are revealed. 7 8 PRAYER WHEREFORE, defendants pray that plaintiff takes nothing by way of her complaint, that

9 defendants be dismissed from this action and be awarded their costs and attorney's fees, and for 10 any other relief that the court may deem just and proper. 11 12 13 DEFENDANTS' DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY To the clerk of the above entitled court: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that these answering defendants herein demand a trial by jury as

14 to all issues triable thereby, herein. 15 16 DATED: October 15, 2007 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By: _/s/________________________________ RANDOLPH S. HOM, Assistant City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL J. O'TOOLE, City Attorney

Ali v. City of Hayward, et al. Case No. C-07 04718 (EM C)

Defendants' Answer to Complaint

12