Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of California - California


File Size: 52.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 29, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 452 Words, 2,708 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/195857/26.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of California ( 52.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 26

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888 BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar #222173 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALEH ALI, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of NASIR SOLIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF HAYWARD, et al, Defendants. /

Case No. C 07 04718 CRB (consolidated with C 07 04739 CRB) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND DATE FOR ADR COMPLIANCE

MARIA JOYA, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of NASIR SOLIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF HAYWARD, a municipal corporation; LLOYD LOWE, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF HAYWARD; JASON CORSOLINI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the CITY OF HAYWARD; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. /

Administrative Motion and (proposed) Order extending date for DADR Compliance

1

Case 3:07-cv-04718-CRB

Document 26

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, the parties jointly file this stipulated motion to continue the date by which the parties are to complete ADR. The parties are presently required, pursuant to the Court's Order, to complete ADR by March 3, 2008. Due to factors including the selection of an ADR neutral and the need to gather further information, the parties jointly request an extension of time to complete ADR, up to May 2, 2008. Dated: January 24, 2008 The Law Offices of John L. Burris

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum Benjamin Nisenbaum Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: January 24, 2008

Law Offices of Kletter & Peretz

/s Yosef Peretz Yosef Peretz Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: January 24, 2008 Michael J. O'Toole, City Attorney

/s/ Randolph S. Hom Randolph S. Hom Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Defendants

(PROPOSED) ORDER GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court hereby grants the parties administrative motion to extend the date for ADR compliance in the above-entitled action to May 2, 2008.
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

IT IS SO ORDERED. Jan. 28, 2008 Dated:_____________

RT U O

LI

FO
A

. Bre harles R Judge C

yer

Administrative Motion and (proposed) Order extending date for DADR Compliance

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

C

R NIA
2

28

D _______________________________ RDERE IS SO O IT Honorable Charles R. Breyer UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NO

S

RT

H