Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 76

Filed 06/24/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Edward O.C. Ord, Esq. (SBN 52123) Ord & Norman 233 Sansome Street, Suite 1111 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 274-3800 Facsimile: (415) 274-3838 Attorney for Defendants Charles Hsin and Optech Limited

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES CATHCART, SCOTT CATHCART, YURIJ DEBEVC, a/k/a YURI DEBEVC, ROBERT NAGY, DERIVIUM CAPITAL (USA), INC., VERIDIA SOLUTIONS, OPTECH LIMITED, CHIHSIU HSIN, a/k/a CHARLES HSIN, FRANKLIN THOMASON Defendants. _______________________________ _____
ORDER

Civil No. 07-4762-PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 711 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Having considered Defendants' Charles Hsin and Optech Limited ("Defendants") administrative motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint, and finding good cause therefore,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

1

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 76

Filed 06/24/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant have to and including [July 15, 2008] [______________________, 2008] by with to file such pleading.

Dated: _______________

___________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
T:\Clients\7118\Admin motion time extension proposed order.doc

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

2

Case 3:07-cv-04762-PJH

Document 76

Filed 06/24/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS HSIN AND OPTECH LIMITED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

I hereby certify that on June 24, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to the following: Joseph P. Russoniello United States Attorney Thomas Moore Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division 9th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Attorney for Plaintiff HUONG T. BAILIE Special Trial Attorney 160 Spear Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Attorney for Plaintiff Farley J. Neuman ([email protected]) Tom Prountzos ([email protected]) Jenkins Goodma Neuman & Hamilton LLP 417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Attorneys for Defendant, Robert Nagy David Bujannoff Porter, Jr. ([email protected]) Wood & Porter 333 Sacramento Street San Francisco, California 94111 Attorney for Defendant Scott Cathcart I further certify that on June 20, 2008, service of the foregoing was made upon the following by depositing a copy in the Unites States mail, postage prepaid: Yuri Debevc (pro se) 1483 Burningtree Road Charleston, SC 29412 /s/ Edward O. Ord____ EDWARD O. ORD 3 Allyson B. Baker Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 7238 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 ([email protected]) Attorney for Plaintiff

ERIC L. WEBB BARTSCH & WEBB 317 Rosecrans Avenue Manhattan Beach, California 90069 ([email protected]) Attorney for Defendant Charles Cathcart